TSE PRIME · 4071 · FY end SEP 株式会社プラスアルファ・コンサルティング
Plus Alpha Consulting Co., Ltd.
HR & Marketing SaaS · Japanese-NLP Compounder
Last Close
¥2,394May 19, 2026
−5% from Aug-25 peak · +105% off Apr-25 trough
Market Cap / EV
¥101.5bn / ¥86.9bn EV
net cash ¥14.56bn (14% of cap) · payout target raised to 40%
EV / OP · forward
14.7x
trailing 13.1x EV/EBITDA · vs Aug-25 peak ~12.3x fwd
ROCE · trailing
46% · 3yr stable
FY9/23 46% → FY9/24 41% → FY9/25 46% · top of universe
OP Margin · group
45% · seg-wtd
reported 37.3% · 7.4pp corporate-overhead bridge · 1H FY9/26 actual 39.5%
Shares & Float
42.4M sh · ~50% float
founder bloc ~33% · Oasis Mgmt 16.29% · avg daily turnover ~¥598M
INTRODUCTION

What does Plus Alpha Consulting do?

Plus Alpha Consulting sells Japanese-language analytics software to enterprise teams. Its main product, Talent Palette, helps HR teams use employee data for hiring, placement, development, and retention decisions. Customers pay recurring software fees, and the product becomes more useful as more HR workflows and employee data move into the system. In Marketing Solutions, Mieruka Engine and Customer Rings help marketing teams analyze customer behavior and improve campaigns. The investor debate is whether Talent Palette can keep adding customers and raising average revenue per customer while Marketing Solutions stabilizes and excess cash is returned more clearly. The key checks are OP margin versus guidance, Talent Palette customer and ARPU trends, and whether partner-channel revenue and buyback policy become more explicit.

01 · PRICE REGIME

What has driven the stock over the past two years?

From ¥1,170 on April 7, 2025, the share climbed to ¥2,510 by August 18, 2025 — a 114% move in four months. The rally followed stronger operating leverage in Talent Palette, an upward revision to FY9/25 guidance, and evidence that margins were expanding faster than revenue. The usual post-rally reversal did not follow. Instead, the stock held around ¥2,000–¥2,500 through three disclosure cycles, a ¥1.15bn goodwill impairment, the FY9/26 +17.6% operating profit (OP) guide reset, and the arrival of an activist shareholder. The May 2026 disclosures then shifted the debate to whether the higher payout target will become a broader capital-return policy.

4071 vs TOPIX · 24 months · daily candles + volume
Peak ¥2,510 · 2025-08-18 Trough ¥1,170 · 2025-04-07 Today ¥2,394
Plus Alpha Consulting · daily candles 60-day SMA TOPIX rebased (1308.T) Volume

01 · THE RALLY Plus Alpha Consulting sells Japanese-language analytics software to business teams, especially HR and marketing teams. Its core product, Talent Palette, helps companies use employee data for hiring, retention, and employee development decisions. The HR-Solutions subscription base reached 2,171 contracts at the end of 1Q FY9/26 (Talent Palette + Yorisor + R-Shift + R-Kintai). Large customers matter because they drive recurring revenue: 40% of customers are above 1,000 employees, and those larger clients account for 73% of Talent Palette recurring revenue. Waters, the company's proprietary Japanese NLP engine, helps convert Japanese business-language data into usable analysis and has been trained over seventeen years. The in-house consulting team then feeds customer workflows back into the product roadmap, creating what management calls the PAC loop: sell, consult, productize, resell. That loop has supported HR Solutions revenue growth above 30% CAGR over the last three years while margins expanded. The current profit model has three moving parts. First, higher revenue from existing software contracts: Talent Palette monthly ARPU reached ¥468,000 in 1Q FY9/26, up 11.3% YoY, with management attributing the lift to the price revisions (started in FY9/24 3Q, cycled through by April 2025) plus option attach and plan upgrades. Second, sales-efficiency gains: as go-to-market shifted from broad marketing aimed at many prospects to sales activity focused on larger named accounts, total SG&A fell 15.9% YoY in 1Q FY9/26, including an approximately 34% drop in the marketing line. Third, selling through partner channels: Plus Alpha is now adding partner channels, with Mynavi TalentBase (launched October 1, 2025) as the first scaled example. The spring-summer 2025 stock move reflected this repricing. Shares bottomed at ¥1,170 on April 7, 2025, then recovered after 1H FY9/25 showed OP up 28.8% YoY. Momentum strengthened after the August 13, 2025 guidance raise (FY9/25 OP target from ¥5,600M to ¥6,100M). By August 18, 2025, the stock reached ¥2,510, implying about 12.3x forward EV/OP on then-known guidance — a four-month re-rating into the upper range of the JII universe.

02 · THE CONSOLIDATION On November 12, 2025 management did three things in a single disclosure. First, it raised the FY9/25 OP forecast a second time, to ¥6,378M against the August-revised ¥6,100M, reflecting continued marketing-cost compression and a clean operating beat. Second, it disclosed a goodwill impairment of ¥1,154M on the Growup and Attack subsidiaries acquired in 2022 and 2024 — Growup's new-graduate direct-recruiting platform Kimisuka and Attack's recruiting-BPO business had both run below the original acquisition plan, and the company elected to write the residual goodwill to zero (Growup ¥1,092M, Attack ¥61M). Third, it announced cancellation of the company's entire treasury balance — 472,250 shares, or 1.10% of pre-cancellation shares outstanding — effective November 28. Two days later, on November 14, the FY9/25 results confirmed revenue up 22.8% YoY to ¥17,084M and OP up 40.8% YoY to ¥6,378M, with group OP margin at 37.3% reported and 44.7% on a segment-weighted basis. The same disclosure pack carried the FY9/26 initial guidance: revenue ¥19,500M (+14.1% YoY), OP ¥7,500M (+17.6% YoY), OP margin target 38.5%. The headline growth rate compressed from +40.8% to +17.6% — a meaningful deceleration — and yet the stock barely moved in the next session. The reason was that the operating-leverage proof had landed alongside two capital-return signals (treasury cancellation, raised dividend guide from ¥29 prior-year actual to ¥38), and that the market read the impairment as the cleansing of M&A residue rather than a fresh problem. The plateau extended through the 1Q FY9/26 print of February 13, 2026 — revenue ¥4,439M (+14.0% YoY), OP ¥1,676M (+49.5% YoY), OP margin 37.8% against the 28.8% prior-year quarter — which confirmed that the 2H FY9/25 margin slope had carried into the new fiscal year.

03 · WHERE WE STAND NOW Two events in late April and early May 2026 reset the case. First, Oasis Management Co., Ltd. disclosed in successive large-shareholder filings (April 23 initial at 8.02%, April 27 amendment to 10.52%, May 1 amendment to 10.62%) that it had built a 10.62% position in the company — an explicit activist filing, with stated purpose of seeking higher shareholder returns, board-effectiveness improvements, and engagement on capital allocation. Oasis's filings state ongoing proposals to the company over the next twelve months and a planned further acquisition of more than 5%. Subsequent filings took the stake to 16.29% (change report submitted June 24, 2026), making Oasis the largest shareholder. Second, on May 13, 2026, management published 1H FY9/26 results — revenue of ¥9,341M, up 14.2% YoY, with OP at ¥3,692M (up 32.2%) and net income at ¥2,518M (up 36.0%) — alongside a dividend policy revision: payout-ratio target raised from 30% to 40% (an August 13, 2025 revision had already lifted it from roughly 20%), a dividend-on-equity (DOE) floor of 8% newly introduced, and FY9/26 DPS forecast raised from ¥38 to ¥50 (a 72% increase versus the FY9/25 actual of ¥29). 1H booked 49.2% of the full-year OP guide and 1H OP margin landed at 39.5%, one point above the 38.5% full-year target. The capital-return lever that the activist is pushing on has therefore partially landed already — though on FY9/26 forecast net income of ¥5,200M the 40% payout works out to roughly ¥2,120M (¥50 × 42.39M shares), about 2.1% of market capitalization, modest against the ¥14.56bn net cash that still sits at 14.4% of capitalization. The next four quarters will resolve three things: whether 2H FY9/26 OP margin holds at or above 38% (which would imply a full-year OP upward revision); whether the Mynavi TalentBase OEM is disclosed as a separable revenue line, proving the partner channel as a distribution leg; and whether the FY9/26 results announcement in November 2026 layers a recurring buyback authorization on top of the 40% payout, converting the activist debate from observation into program.

02 · CONTENTION

What are investors debating now?

Three open questions surface in the company's recent quarterly disclosures and in the May 13 IR briefing. Each one settles a different part of the multiple.

DEBATE 01 · OPERATING LEVERAGE
Is the FY9/26 +17.6% YoY OP guide conservative, or does it embed a real 2H cost step-up that closes the gap to the 1H print?
BULL Bulls read 1H FY9/26 as evidence that the +17.6% guide is already conservative. 1H OP margin 39.5% sits a point above the 38.5% full-year target; 1H booked 49.2% of the OP guide on revenue up 14.2% YoY. 1Q had already run OP up 49.5% YoY on revenue up 14.0% YoY, with total SG&A down 15.9% YoY. Talent Palette monthly average revenue per user is at ¥468,000, up 11.3% YoY, with the price-revision cycle completed in April 2025 and now annualizing, and option attach and plan upgrades continuing. The view holds if 3Q FY9/26 (August 2026) prints OP margin at or above 38% with revenue growth at or above 13% YoY, and FY9/26 OP lands at or above ¥7,800M (4% upward revision against guide).
BEAR Bears note that the 1H print was disproportionately concentrated in 1Q — the +49.5% OP growth in 1Q came from the low cost base after the FY9/25 marketing-spend reset, which is not repeatable. Personnel cost contributed the largest negative item (about −¥159M) to the 1Q OP bridge, and partner-channel buildout for the Mynavi OEM is still building. The Mieruka Engine in Marketing Solutions is in slow contraction — customer count down 96 YoY to 744 and monthly churn at 1.29% (FY9/25). Acquisition costs return as soon as Talent Palette pushes into smaller enterprise segments. The view holds if 3Q FY9/26 OP margin falls below 35% and net new customer additions slow to fewer than 100 YoY.
DEBATE 02 · TALENT PALETTE CONCENTRATION
With approximately two-thirds of group revenue dependent on a single SaaS product, is the OEM partner channel a real second engine or a story investors cannot yet verify in the numbers?
BULL Bulls argue that Talent Palette is not a single product but a platform — 7,200-plus accumulated features built over nine years on the Talent Palette platform (which runs on the seventeen-year-old Waters Japanese-NLP engine), and a 4,500-company cumulative installed base. The OEM channel extends distribution without dilution: Mynavi TalentBase launched October 1, 2025 with Mynavi's recruiting-media reach plus SHL diagnostics bolted on; the Rakus capital tie-up signed November 2025 will produce a sub-300-employee SMB OEM ("Rakuraku Jinji Roumu") in FY9/26; the LinkedIn alliance announced November 2025 is the first such partner contract in Japan. The view holds if Mynavi OEM revenue is disclosed as a separable line by 4Q FY9/26 and tracks an annualized run-rate at or above ¥500M entering FY9/27.
BEAR Bears note that HR Solutions is 77.5% of FY9/25 group revenue and Talent Palette is approximately 85% of HR Solutions — roughly two-thirds of the company on a single SaaS product. Marketing Solutions, the 22.5% counterweight, is in contraction with monthly churn at 1.29% in FY9/25. Management's M&A record into the recruiting adjacencies is poor: the Growup and Attack acquisitions just impaired ¥1.15bn of goodwill at FY9/25 close. Partner OEM revenue carries no separately disclosed figure today and management comments about the pipeline do not yet constitute evidence. The view holds if Mieruka customer count falls below 700 and Talent Palette monthly average revenue per user decelerates below 5% YoY at the 3Q FY9/26 print.
DEBATE 03 · CAPITAL RETURN
Is the May 13 payout-target raise to 40% (with a DOE 8% floor) the start of a wider capital-return framework, or where the framework stops?
BULL Bulls observe that the May 13, 2026 dividend revision did three things at once: lifted the payout-ratio target from 30% to 40%, introduced a DOE (dividend-on-equity) floor of 8%, and raised the FY9/26 DPS forecast from ¥38 to ¥50 (a 72% YoY increase against the ¥29 FY9/25 actual). With ¥15.46bn net cash (2Q B/S) on a ¥125.8bn market capitalization and a sustainable ROE of 28% or higher, the math allows for the 40% payout to coexist with a recurring buyback. The Oasis Management position — 16.29% per the June 24 filing, making it the largest shareholder — explicitly seeking higher shareholder returns and stating intent to accumulate further, raises the probability of a repeatable buyback or capital-return plan. The view holds if FY9/26 results in November 2026 introduce a recurring buyback authorization on top of the 40% payout target.
BEAR Bears note that the founder bloc — chief executive Mimuro Katsuya (17.65% including his Alfa Style asset-management vehicle) plus co-founder director Suzumura Kenji (15.78% including Plus Energy) — controls roughly 33% of outstanding shares, and founders historically retain control over capital-allocation decisions. The 472,250-share cancellation in November 2025 was the company's residual treasury balance, not a fresh program; no buyback has been authorized since. On FY9/26 forecast net income of ¥5,200M, the 40% payout sends roughly ¥2,120M to shareholders — about 2.1% of market capitalization — while net cash grows past ¥16bn by FY9/26 close on the 1H run-rate. The view holds if FY9/26 results retain the 40% payout target with no incremental buyback and net cash crosses ¥16bn by fiscal year end.
03 · CATALYST

What could change over the next twelve months?

Three disclosure and capital-policy levers based on current blind spots in company reporting. Any one could change how the market values the stock without requiring a higher earnings base.

LEVER 01 · DISCLOSURE
OEM-channel revenue breakout (Mynavi + Rakus)
Partner OEM motion (status at 1Q FY9/26)
Mynavi TalentBase
live 2025-10-01
Rakus Rakuraku Jinji Roumu
FY9/26 launch
LinkedIn alliance
signed Nov 2025
Separately disclosed rev
none
three partner OEMs in flight · zero contribution disclosed today
Management presents the partner channel as a transformational second engine, but the FY9/26 guide carries no quantified OEM contribution. After the Nov 2025 Growup/Attack impairment, the market no longer credits qualitative pipeline commentary alone. Publishing a separate Mynavi OEM revenue line — even at small absolute scale (e.g., ¥150–300M in FY9/26, ¥500M+ entering FY9/27, or a quarterly disclosure showing OEM as a percentage of total HR-Solutions revenue) — converts narrative into evidence and prices in the partner optionality the market is currently ignoring.
Cost to mgmt
One additional segment-detail line per quarterly
Earliest trigger
3Q FY9/26 release · Aug 2026
LEVER 02 · CAPITAL POLICY
Recurring buyback authorization on top of the 40% payout
FY9/26 capital-return composition
DPS ¥50 (forecast)
¥2,120M
Buyback
none
Forecast NI
¥5,200M
Net cash on BS
¥14,560M
40% payout / DOE 8% floor on ROE 28%+ · net cash 14.4% of cap and growing
The May 13 dividend revision raised the payout target from 30% to 40% and set a DOE floor of 8% — partial landing of the lever. Sized against FY9/26 forecast net income of ¥5,200M, that delivers roughly ¥2,120M (~2.1% of capitalization) in dividends while net cash continues to compound. Concrete options for the November 2026 board: a ¥3–5bn annual buyback envelope (3–5% of capitalization); a total-return floor above the new 40% payout; or a net-cash-to-capitalization ceiling at 15% that automatically triggers buybacks above the threshold. Any of the three converts an over-capitalized balance sheet from observation into a re-rating event and addresses the activist engagement that began in April 2026.
Cost to mgmt
One board resolution
Earliest trigger
FY9/26 results · Nov 2026
LEVER 03 · DISCLOSURE
Talent Palette ARPU growth decomposition by quarter
Talent Palette ARPU by enterprise tier (FY9/25 end, ¥K/month)
5,000+ employees
¥1,642
1,000–4,999
¥613
500–999
¥339
200–499
¥183
9.0x ARPU spread top:bottom · enterprise mix is the lever, opacity is the friction
Management attributes the +11.3% YoY Talent Palette ARPU lift in 1Q FY9/26 to the price revisions (rolled out from FY9/24 3Q, cycled through by April 2025) plus option attach and plan upgrades. The price-hike runway is finite by construction — once every existing customer has renewed at the higher price the contribution rolls off. A quarterly decomposition of ARPU growth (price, option-attach, plan-upgrade, customer-mix) by enterprise tier would let the market underwrite the durability of ARPU expansion rather than discount it to its weakest leg. Costs management one additional KPI table per briefing.
Cost to mgmt
One KPI table per quarterly
Earliest trigger
3Q FY9/26 release · Aug 2026
04 · VALUATION

What has to be true for the stock to work from here?

JII uses three internally consistent scenarios for the next four quarters. Each scenario maps a different bundle of disclosure and operating outcomes. These are analytical cases, not company guidance and not predictions.

BEAR SCENARIO
¥1,800 – ¥2,000
−25% to −16%
implied multiple · ~9–10x EV/OP (fwd)
The 1H incremental margin was front-loaded; partner OEM stays narrative; capital remains undeployed.
What would have to happen
  • 3Q FY9/26 OP margin compresses below 35%; full-year lands at the 38.5% guide via heavy 2H cost normalization.
  • Talent Palette net new customer additions slow to fewer than 100 YoY; ARPU growth decelerates below +5%.
  • Mieruka Engine customer count falls below 700; segment becomes OP drag rather than melting cash cow.
  • FY9/26 results retain the 40% payout with no buyback; net cash crosses ¥16bn.
  • No separately disclosed OEM revenue line; partner channel narrative remains unverifiable.

The bear band of ¥1,800–¥2,000 implies ~9–10x FY9/26 EV/OP — meaningfully below the Japan SaaS peer band but above the JP private-buyer 7–10x EV/OP floor on a 46% ROCE asset. Multiple-driven only if the market continues to discount the durability of Talent Palette operating leverage.

BASE SCENARIO
¥2,500 – ¥2,900
+4% to +21%
implied multiple · ~12–14x EV/OP (fwd)
The 1H incremental rate carries; one of the three levers lands.
What would have to happen
  • 3Q FY9/26 prints OP margin at or above 37% with revenue growth at or above 13%; FY9/26 OP lands at or above ¥7,800M (4% above guide).
  • Talent Palette net new customer additions hold above 150 YoY on enterprise + Mynavi-OEM contribution.
  • Either Mynavi OEM revenue is disclosed separately or a recurring buyback is authorized at FY9/26 results.
  • Quarterly ARPU decomposition appears in the 3Q or 4Q briefing.
BULL SCENARIO
¥3,200 – ¥3,800
+34% to +59%
implied multiple · ~15–18x EV/OP (fwd)
Two of the three levers land; the 1H incremental rate is confirmed as durable.
What would have to happen
  • 3Q FY9/26 prints OP margin at or above 40%, revenue growth at or above 14%; FY9/26 OP at or above ¥8,200M (9% above guide); upward revision filed.
  • Talent Palette ARPU growth holds at or above +10% YoY on continued enterprise mix shift; net customer additions accelerate to 250+ YoY.
  • Mynavi OEM revenue disclosed at ¥150–300M annualized; ¥500M+ FY9/27 trajectory implied.
  • Recurring buyback authorization (¥3–5bn envelope) announced at FY9/26 results paired with the 40% payout.
  • Oasis engagement converts into formal IR-disclosed capital-allocation framework; founder-bloc support secured.

The bull peak of ¥3,800 implies a re-rating to ~15–18x forward EV/OP — consistent with the multiple band of US mid-cap HR-SaaS peers (Paycom, Paylocity) and and above the domestic VOC/CDP peer pair, which de-rated to ~9x forward EV/OP by mid-2026. Re-rating beyond that requires either international expansion (the Waters Japanese-NLP moat does not export) or a structural Marketing Solutions inflection, neither of which is in the four-quarter window.

SUM-OF-PARTS · HR SOLUTIONS
Talent Palette + Yorisor + R-Shift + HIcare Wellness · 77.5% of group revenue
FY9/26 segment revenue (est.)~¥15,100M
Segment OPM (FY9/25 actual)44.8%
Implied segment OP mid-case~¥7,000–7,200M
Applied multiple @ 14–16x fwd EV/OP~¥98–115bn EV
Mid-case implied HR EV: ~¥105bn at 15x fwd segment OP — framed against the peer-ladder median below.
SUM-OF-PARTS · MARKETING SOLUTIONS
Mieruka Engine + Customer Rings · 22.5% of group revenue
FY9/26 segment revenue (est.)~¥4,400M
Segment OPM (FY9/25 actual)44.5%
Implied segment OP mid-case~¥1,760M
Applied multiple @ 10–12x fwd EV/OP~¥17.6–21.1bn EV
Anchor: User Local (3984), the only listed text-mining VOC-analytics pure-play, trades at ~8.7x fwd EV/OP / ~7.9x trailing EV/EBITDA on the July 10, 2026 close.
PEER MULTIPLE LADDER · July 10, 2026
Listed Japan SaaS & data-platform peers · forward EV/OP / trailing EV/EBITDA
3984 User Local · text-mining VOC analytics8.7x / 7.9x
4071 Plus Alpha · this Profile14.7x / 13.1x
4165 Plaid · CDP / KARTE8.9x / 14.8x
4180 Appier Group · Asian AI platform (IFRS)18.6x / 12.0x
Peer median ~9x fwd · Plus Alpha at 14.7x sits mid-band — above the two domestic VOC/CDP names (User Local, Plaid, both de-rated to ~9x fwd) and below Appier's IFRS Asian-AI multiple. Forward EV/OP recomputed on the July 10, 2026 live close: current EV (close × shares − net cash) over each peer's published forward OP guide. Kaonavi (4435) dropped from the ladder — taken private and delisted from the TSE.
SOTP CROSS-CHECK · TOTAL
Operating EV + net cash bridge to market capitalization
HR Solutions EV @ 14–16x fwd~¥98–115bn
Marketing Solutions EV @ 10–12x fwd~¥17.6–21.1bn
Net cash add-back¥14,560M
SOTP implied MC range~¥130–151bn
Current MC (Jul 10)¥125.8bn
SOTP mid-case implies +3% to +20% upside vs spot — a narrow margin at the low end, resting on the peer-multiple median rather than thesis-justified. Each scenario band in the column-three pathways narrows that gap conditional on which catalyst lands.
Important Disclaimer · 重要なご注意

This is not investment advice.

Japan Investor Interface Co., Ltd. ("JII") is an investor-relations (IR) consultancy. JII is not a registered investment advisor, financial advisor, broker-dealer, or securities firm in any jurisdiction. JII is not registered as a Financial Instruments Business Operator (金融商品取引業者) under Japan's Financial Instruments and Exchange Act. JII does not have a 投資助言・代理業 registration and does not provide investment advice or solicit the purchase, sale, or holding of any security.

JII Compounders is an editorial publication. Each profile is an analytical study of how publicly disclosed information about a Japanese listed company has been received by the market. It is intended for educational and research purposes for IR professionals, finance students, journalists, and other readers interested in corporate disclosure practice. Nothing in this publication constitutes a recommendation, opinion, suggestion, or solicitation to buy, sell, or hold any security, derivative, or other financial instrument. Price targets, scenario ranges, multiples, and comparable-company references are illustrative of analytical method only and must not be interpreted as JII's investment opinion. JII does not have an investment opinion on any security discussed.

No reliance. The information presented may be incomplete, out of date, or incorrect. Forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain. Past price performance does not indicate future results. Estimates and scenario figures are not predictions and may not be achieved. JII makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or reliability of any information in this publication.

No fiduciary or advisory relationship. Reading this publication does not create any advisory, fiduciary, or professional relationship between you and JII. Before making any investment, tax, accounting, legal, or other decision, you should consult qualified, licensed advisors in your jurisdiction and conduct your own independent due diligence based on primary disclosures issued by the company concerned.

Conflicts & positions. JII may provide paid IR diagnostic, translation, or interpretation services to Japanese listed companies, including companies discussed in this publication. JII does not trade in or hold positions in the securities of companies profiled. Where a JII engagement exists with a profiled company, that fact will be disclosed at the top of the profile.

Trademarks & data. Company names, logos, tickers, and product names referenced are the property of their respective owners. Share-price data is licensed from third-party providers. TradingView is a trademark of TradingView, Inc. All rights reserved.

本資料は、日本の金融商品取引法に基づく投資助言・代理業ではなく、特定の有価証券の売買その他の取引の勧誘・推奨を目的とするものではありません。本資料は教育・研究を目的とした分析記事であり、JII(株式会社ジャパン・インベスター・インターフェース)は、本資料の内容に基づく投資判断について一切の責任を負いません。投資の判断はご自身の責任と独立した調査に基づいて行ってください。

All Compounder Profiles · Methodology · Glossary Japan Investor Interface Co., Ltd.