TSE GROWTH · 4168 · FY end DEC 株式会社ヤプリ
Yappli, Inc.
No-code Mobile DX Platform · Multi-product engagement SaaS
Last Close
¥745May 19, 2026
−41% from Aug-25 peak · +27% off Apr-25 trough
Market Cap / EV
¥9.52bn / ¥8.48bn EV
net cash ¥1.04bn (11% of cap) · FY25 total payout 34%
EV / EBIT · forward
8.5x
trailing 9.6x · vs Aug-25 peak ~15x fwd · strict pass (≤12x)
Return on capital · trailing
24%
FY24 20.5% → FY25 24% · re-accelerating · ROE 37% on tax-shield-lifted NI
Operating margin
23% · Q1 FY26 actual
FY25 reported 14.6% · FY26 guide 14.7% · Q1 record, ad-spend back-end-loaded
Shares & Float
12.78M sh · TSE Growth
treasury 209k (1.6%) · avg daily turnover ~¥79M · 60d
INTRODUCTION

What does Yappli do?

Yappli provides a no-code mobile-app platform. Companies can build and operate iOS and Android apps without writing most code in-house. The paying customer is the enterprise or operator that runs the app; end users are its shoppers, members, or employees. The product value is ongoing operation — content updates, push notifications, ID and point-card functions, and app-store compatibility support — not just initial launch. Roughly 80% of revenue comes from recurring platform subscriptions, with the rest from implementation and growth support. Once app operations sit inside Yappli’s workflow, switching frictions can rise. The key checks are churn, average monthly subscription fee per logo, and contract-count progression.

01 · PRICE REGIME

What has driven the stock over the past two years?

The stock rose from ¥585 in April 2025 to ¥1,263 in August 2025, a 116% move, then retraced roughly 40%. The rally followed the first dividend and early evidence that the multi-product line could raise contract value. The pullback followed two disclosures: the November 2025 Choose Monster deal, which added goodwill even as FY25 guidance rose, and the February 2026 clarification that the FY26 tax shield runs out, so FY27 net income normalizes closer to operating profit.

4168 vs TOPIX · 24 months · daily candles + volume
Peak ¥1,263 · 2025-08-18 Trough ¥585 · 2025-04-07 Today ¥745
Yappli · daily candles 60-day SMA TOPIX rebased (1308.T) Volume

01 · THE RALLY Yappli sells a no-code mobile-app platform used by non-developers at retail-apparel chains, restaurant operators, sports teams, and a growing internal-app customer set. In practice, customers are not only buying app creation. They are buying daily app operations inside one system: Apple and Google store-review handling, OS-update compatibility, push notifications, member ID, point-card functions, and content management. Revenue comes in two layers: recurring platform subscriptions at around 80% of sales, plus one-time professional-services support (creation support at signing and growth support after launch) at around 20%. Since 2024, Yappli WebX, Yappli MiniApp, and Yappli MobileOrder have been added on the same ID and content layer, so cross-sell can lift contribution margin. The key checks are contract growth with sub-one-percent gross-revenue churn, lifetime-value-to-customer-acquisition-cost ratio (Q1 FY26 6.6x, record), and average monthly subscription fee per logo (¥466k Q1 FY26, +3.9% year-on-year). From the post-IPO trough of ¥585 on April 7, 2025, the stock climbed after the May 14 Q1 FY25 disclosure that included the first dividend declaration (¥6 interim + ¥7 final, ¥13 total, 18.1% payout). Investors began to treat Yappli as eligible for capital return, not only reinvestment. The move extended through summer as smartLP was rebranded Yappli WebX and the multi-product line gained credibility. The share reached ¥1,263 on August 18, 2025, a 116% move in four months, and forward EV/operating profit rose to roughly 15x.

02 · THE REVERSAL On November 13, 2025 management did two things in a single disclosure. First, it upward-revised the FY25 operating-profit guide from ¥750M to ¥830M and raised the dividend forecast in tandem; read alone, the revision should have extended the climb. Second, the same release announced the acquisition of Choose Monster for ¥130M cash, of which ¥113M — 87% of the purchase price — was recognized as goodwill amortized over nine years, with no published comparison to the alternative of repurchasing ¥130M of Yappli stock at the then-prevailing valuation. Through autumn the multiple compressed as the market re-priced execution risk on the multi-product pivot. On February 13, 2026 management published FY25 actuals — revenue ¥6,056M, parent operating profit ¥889M (+61.5%), net income ¥920M, beating the November-raised guide. But the FY26 guide framed a slower year (operating profit ¥1,000M, net income ¥930M flat) and the briefing spelled out a structural point that would weigh on the multiple for six months: the carry-forward losses providing a tax-shield on net income would run out in FY26, after which FY27 net income would normalize to the operating-profit base. That clarifying comment became the multiple-compression trigger. Investors began discounting an FY27 net-income optics drag despite no change in the underlying business, and through spring the share retraced through the ¥800s to the ¥700s. The reversal carried two structural sources: a partly-justifiable compression as the FY26 guide implied a slower slope after FY25, and a partly-over-extended discount built around the FY27 tax-shield narrative.

03 · WHERE WE STAND NOW The Q1 FY26 print landed on May 13, 2026: revenue ¥1,707M (+19.1%), operating profit ¥396M (+77.6%), net income ¥390M (+75.1%), and operating margin at an all-time high of 23.2% — 8.5 percentage points above the FY26 full-year guide of 14.7%. Gross-revenue churn (LTM) improved from 0.92% to 0.86%, ahead of management's prior "H2 FY26 improvement" timeline. The lifetime-value-to-acquisition-cost ratio climbed to 6.6x, above management's own 5x re-investment threshold. Total contracts rose to 958 across the four-product line, with cross-sell wins at Alpen, Dr. Martens, and Sarutahiko Coffee. Management paired the print with a second upward dividend revision (FY26 from ¥14 to ¥15, payout 20.6%) and the appointment of four new executive officers effective Q2 FY26 — the CFO appointment in particular signals capital-allocation discipline will be more institutionalized. The share has eased back to ¥745, still 41% below the August 2025 peak. The implied compression is roughly 6.5x of forward EV/EBIT, half justifiable and half over-discount: an FY26 guide the Q1 print signals is conservative, a ¥1bn-plus net cash pile, a 37% return on equity, and a still-undefined capital-return policy. The next four quarters will resolve three things: whether Q2 and Q3 FY26 each land at or above 18% operating margin once the planned ¥180M / quarter lead-generation ad-spend resumes; whether the FY26 results disclosure in February 2027 formalizes a total-return policy on top of the ¥15 dividend; and whether cohort-level churn disclosure separates the Marketing-cohort story from the HR / UNITE tailwind that has carried the headline.

02 · CONTENTION

Which debates are driving the stock now?

Three open questions surface in the company's recent quarterly disclosures and in the IR briefing Q&A. Each one settles a different part of the multiple.

DEBATE 01 · MARGIN DURABILITY
Is the Q1 23.2% operating margin the new structural floor, or a timing artefact that gives back in Q2 once ad-spend resumes?
BULL Bulls read the Q1 print as proof that the multi-product platform is hitting operating leverage even on a higher cost-base than the market had assumed — the structural margin expansion holding through a year of multi-product cost loading. Gross-profit margin expanded to 69.8% on professional-services mix and server-cost efficiency; the contract count grew to 958 across four products at sub-one-percent churn; the lifetime-value-to-acquisition-cost ratio of 6.6x sits above management's 5x re-investment threshold. The view holds if Q2 and Q3 FY26 each land at or above 18% operating margin with revenue growth at or above 15% year-on-year, and the H1 incremental rate carries through the planned ¥180M / quarter ad-spend re-ramp.
BEAR Bears note that the Q1 23.2% margin embeds professional-services mix favorability (creation-support pulled forward) plus an ad-spend timing benefit of roughly ¥30M as Q1 ran below the ¥180M / quarter guided cadence. The structural margin floor for a multi-product SaaS at this stage is meaningfully closer to the FY26 full-year guide of 14.7% than to 23.2%. The view holds if Q2 FY26 operating margin compresses to 14-16% — consistent with the FY26 full-year guide and confirming that the Q1 print was a mix and timing event, not a structural step.
DEBATE 02 · CAPITAL RETURN
Is the ¥15 dividend a placeholder before the framework formalizes, or the natural ceiling for a still-investing growth story?
BULL Bulls observe that Yappli now runs a 37% return on equity with ¥1.04bn of net cash and operating cash flow of ¥776M in FY25 — the firm generates capital faster than it can find return-on-investment-accretive deployment, and the appointment of a CFO at Q1 FY26 signals a more institutionalized approach. The total payout of 34% in FY25 (¥166M dividend plus ¥149M buyback) was the first such return after years of pure reinvestment; the FY26 ¥15 dividend lifts payout ratio to 20.6%. The view holds if FY9/26 results disclosure (Feb 2027) raises the payout target above 30%, introduces a multi-year buyback authorization, or publishes a formula-based total-return policy.
BEAR Bears note that management's stated allocation priority remains "growth investment first" and that the November 2025 Choose Monster acquisition demonstrated the bias — ¥130M deployed at 87% goodwill, with no published post-mortem framework. The undecided buyback language in the Q1 FY26 disclosure is consistent with prior cycles. The view holds if FY26 results disclosure (Feb 2027) retains the existing payout target without a buyback authorization and net cash crosses ¥1.5bn without explicit deployment commentary.
DEBATE 03 · MULTI-PRODUCT PIVOT
Does the four-product line lift average revenue per logo and total contract count, or dilute the headline subscription economics?
BULL Bulls point to the Q1 FY26 disclosure showing 958 total contracts (+6.9% year-on-year) on the four-product line, of which 939 are core Yappli apps and the remainder are WebX, MiniApp, and MobileOrder cross-sells. Average monthly subscription fee per logo held steady at ¥466k (+3.9% year-on-year) despite WebX and MiniApp being lower-priced. Cited cross-sell wins (Alpen, Dr. Martens, Sarutahiko Coffee) show enterprises consolidating their digital surface area on Yappli. The view holds if FY26 full-year contract count exceeds 1,020 with subscription fee per logo ≥¥460k.
BEAR Bears note that the cross-sell wins are concentrated in a handful of named accounts and that the underlying Yappli for Marketing cohort — 62% of total contracts — saw the LTM churn rate rise from 0.77% to 0.92% across FY25 before improving to 0.86% at Q1 FY26. Cohort-level retention is not disclosed; HR / UNITE growth may be diluting an elevated Marketing-cohort number. The view holds if FY26 results disclosure includes a cohort-level churn breakdown showing the Marketing cohort still above 1.0% LTM.
03 · CATALYST

What could change over the next twelve months?

Three disclosure or capital-policy levers drawn from the company's disclosed capital-efficiency blind spots. Each could reweight the multiple without requiring higher earnings.

LEVER 01 · CAPITAL POLICY
Formalize the total-return policy — lift the payout floor
FY25 capital return composition & deployment gap
FY25 dividend
¥166M
FY25 buyback
¥149M
FY25 net income
¥920M
Net cash on BS
¥1,041M
FY25 total payout 34% on ROE 37% · FY26 buyback undecided · cash pile growing
Walk the arithmetic in five steps. One: FY25 net income was ¥920M and the total payout ratio was 34%, so retention was 66% — ¥605M of retained earnings. Two: the disclosed organic deployment was R&D ¥337M (expensed), capex ¥0.6M, and the ¥130M Choose Monster acquisition — ¥468M deployed in total. Three: the residual is ¥605M − ¥468M ≈ ¥137M, the surplus that flowed straight to the cash pile (cash on balance sheet moved from ¥1,959M to ¥2,204M over the year, directionally consistent). Four: Yappli's trailing return on capital employed is 24%, and that is the hurdle — every retained yen must earn at least 24% in incremental deployment to be value-accretive against simply paying it out. Five: beyond roughly ¥500M of organic deployment the marginal opportunity narrows, and M&A at the Choose Monster 87% goodwill ratio does not clear the hurdle, so the unaccretive marginal yen sits as cash earning roughly 0.4% in bank deposits. The drift state follows: cash is rising as a percent of capitalization, and management has not published a deployment framework. Unless management finds accretive reinvestment, the cash pile just keeps growing — mechanically, every year. What closes the gap is a formula-based total-return policy that absorbs the surplus when deployment cannot.
Cost to mgmt
One board resolution + one IR slide
Earliest trigger
Q2 FY26 release · Aug 2026
LEVER 02 · DISCLOSURE
Cohort-level churn & NRR by solution domain
FY25-Q1 FY26 LTM churn · headline vs cohort weights
Marketing cohort (62%)
~1.1% est.
HR / UNITE cohort (16%)
~0.3% est.
Other (22%)
~0.8% est.
Headline LTM (disclosed)
0.86%
cohort weights inferred from contract-count disclosure · cohort-level churn not published
The customer base splits into three distinct segments — retail and e-commerce apps (the Marketing solution), HR and employee-engagement apps (UNITE), and a residual of BtoB, media, and government apps. These three segments are the firm's customer cohorts, and the retention dynamics of each one drive how much revenue any single contract eventually delivers. The longer a customer renews, the more revenue the contract returns — what management refers to as lifetime value, or LTV. Only consolidated LTM churn is disclosed today. Management acknowledged in Q4 FY25 commentary that the Marketing cohort drove the headline rise from 0.77% to 0.92%; the Q1 FY26 improvement to 0.86% may again be HR / UNITE growth diluting a still-elevated Marketing number. Disclosing cohort-level LTM churn and net revenue retention by solution domain (Marketing / HR / Other), alongside cohort-level contract counts, separates the structural retention story from the mix-driven headline. The market currently applies a discount to the Marketing cohort's lifetime value because the cohort-level number is opaque; symmetric disclosure removes that discount.
Cost to mgmt
One additional KPI table per quarterly
Earliest trigger
Q2 FY26 release · Aug 2026
LEVER 03 · DISCLOSURE
M&A discipline framework — YFC year-one stand-alone disclosure
Choose Monster (YFC) acquisition mechanics
Purchase price
¥130M
Goodwill recognized
¥113M (87%)
Net tangible assets
¥17M
9-yr SL amortization
¥12.6M/yr
no published comparison to alternative deployment (e.g., ¥130M buyback at then-prevailing valuation)
Choose Monster (now Yappli Food Connect) was acquired November 28, 2025 for ¥130M cash, of which ¥113M (87%) was recognized as goodwill amortized over nine years. The deal reads as a capability acquisition — the LINE Mini App channel plus an F&B vertical — rather than as a financial bet, but no published IRR framework compares the ¥130M deployment to the alternative of repurchasing ¥130M of Yappli stock at the then-prevailing valuation. Publishing YFC year-one stand-alone revenue and operating profit at the FY26 results disclosure, alongside a CFO-signed IRR-vs-alternative-use threshold for future deals, institutionalizes the capital-allocation discipline that the May-13 CFO appointment hinted at.
Cost to mgmt
One IR slide + one YUHO note
Earliest trigger
FY26 results · Feb 2027
04 · VALUATION

What has to be true for the stock to work from here?

Three internally-consistent scenarios across the next four quarters. Each describes a different bundle of disclosure and operating outcomes — no single scenario is forecast; they are analytical bookends.

BEAR SCENARIO
¥550 – ¥650
−26% to −13%
implied multiple · ~5–6x EV/EBIT (fwd)
The Q1 operating margin was timing; Marketing-cohort churn re-deteriorates; capital sits.
What would have to happen
  • Q2 FY26 operating margin compresses below 16%; full-year lands at the 14.7% guide.
  • FY26 contract count grows below +5% as the Marketing cohort sees renewed churn pressure (LTM ticks back above 1.0%).
  • FY26 results retain the existing payout target; no buyback authorization; net cash crosses ¥1.5bn.
  • No cohort-level churn disclosure; YFC year-one revenue under ¥250M with operating contribution below break-even.
  • FY27 net-income normalization narrative dominates the read as the tax-shield runs out.

The bear band of ¥550–¥650 implies ~4.6–5.6x FY26 forward EV/EBIT — meaningfully below the Japanese mid-cap SaaS peer band of 10–15x and below the JP private-buyer 7–10x cohort for asset-light specialty technology businesses. Multiple-driven only if the market discounts the recurring book's durability beyond what a strategic acquirer would pay for it.

BASE SCENARIO
¥850 – ¥1,000
+14% to +34%
implied multiple · ~10–11x EV/EBIT (fwd)
The Q1 margin holds enough to drive an upward revision; one of the three levers lands.
What would have to happen
  • Q2 FY26 (Aug 2026) prints operating margin ≥18% with revenue growth ≥15% year-on-year; FY26 OP comes in ≥¥1,080M (8% above guide) on an upward revision filed at Q3.
  • FY26 contract count exceeds 1,020 on continued multi-product cross-sell.
  • Either a cohort-level churn / NRR breakdown or a formula-based capital-return policy is published at FY26 results.
  • YFC year-one revenue lands in ¥250–400M band with positive contribution.
BULL SCENARIO
¥1,150 – ¥1,350
+54% to +81%
implied multiple · ~13–15x EV/EBIT (fwd)
Two of the three levers land; FY27 tax-shield runoff is pre-narrated and de-stigmatized.
What would have to happen
  • Q2 FY26 operating margin ≥20%, revenue growth ≥18%; FY26 OP ≥¥1,150M (15% above guide); upward revision filed.
  • Total contract count reaches ≥1,050 on Yappli MiniApp + MobileOrder traction beyond the named-account exemplars.
  • Capital-return policy is formalized at FY26 results with a buyback authorization in the ¥300–500M range alongside the dividend.
  • Cohort-level churn disclosed; Marketing cohort confirmed below 1.0% LTM.
  • Management pre-frames the FY27 net-income transition in the FY26 briefing — operating-profit growth ≥15% in FY27 with NI optics reset to operating base.

The bull peak of ¥1,350 sits modestly above the August 2025 high of ¥1,263 and embeds a re-rating to ~13-15x forward EV/EBIT — in the band where Japanese profitable mid-cap SaaS names like Cybozu (10x), PR TIMES (12x), and HENNGE (25x) cluster. Re-rating beyond that requires Yappli WebX and MiniApp turning into second compounding engines, which is multi-year optionality outside the four-quarter scenario.

SUM-OF-PARTS · CORE YAPPLI PLATFORM
Yappli + Yappli WebX + Yappli MiniApp · ~95% of group revenue
FY26 segment revenue (est.)~¥6.5bn
Segment OPM (FY26 guide proxy)~15%
Implied segment OP mid-case~¥975M
Peer multiple (Cybozu 10x, PR TIMES 12x)~10–12x EV/EBIT
Mid-case implied EV: ~¥10–12bn at 11x fwd segment OP
SUM-OF-PARTS · YFC + EQUITY METHOD + NET CASH
Yappli Food Connect (51.4%) + Fuller equity method (21.8%) + net cash
YFC FY26 revenue (est.)~¥250–400M
YFC implied EV @ 1.5–2x rev~¥375–800M
Fuller equity-method book value¥499M
Excess net cash add-back¥1,041M
SOTP cross-check vs current EV~¥11–14bn MC vs ¥9.5bn
SOTP supports BASE–BULL once one of the three CATALYST levers lands
Important Disclaimer · 重要なご注意

This is not investment advice.

Japan Investor Interface Co., Ltd. ("JII") is an investor-relations (IR) consultancy. JII is not a registered investment advisor, financial advisor, broker-dealer, or securities firm in any jurisdiction. JII is not registered as a Financial Instruments Business Operator (金融商品取引業者) under Japan's Financial Instruments and Exchange Act. JII does not have a 投資助言・代理業 registration and does not provide investment advice or solicit the purchase, sale, or holding of any security.

JII Compounders is an editorial publication. Each profile is an analytical study of how publicly disclosed information about a Japanese listed company has been received by the market. It is intended for educational and research purposes for IR professionals, finance students, journalists, and other readers interested in corporate disclosure practice. Nothing in this publication constitutes a recommendation, opinion, suggestion, or solicitation to buy, sell, or hold any security, derivative, or other financial instrument. Price targets, scenario ranges, multiples, and comparable-company references are illustrative of analytical method only and must not be interpreted as JII's investment opinion. JII does not have an investment opinion on any security discussed.

No reliance. The information presented may be incomplete, out of date, or incorrect. Forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain. Past price performance does not indicate future results. Estimates and scenario figures are not predictions and may not be achieved. JII makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or reliability of any information in this publication.

No fiduciary or advisory relationship. Reading this publication does not create any advisory, fiduciary, or professional relationship between you and JII. Before making any investment, tax, accounting, legal, or other decision, you should consult qualified, licensed advisors in your jurisdiction and conduct your own independent due diligence based on primary disclosures issued by the company concerned.

Conflicts & positions. JII may provide paid IR diagnostic, translation, or interpretation services to Japanese listed companies, including companies discussed in this publication. JII does not trade in or hold positions in the securities of companies profiled. Where a JII engagement exists with a profiled company, that fact will be disclosed at the top of the profile.

Trademarks & data. Company names, logos, tickers, and product names referenced are the property of their respective owners. Share-price data is licensed from third-party providers. TradingView is a trademark of TradingView, Inc. All rights reserved.

本資料は、日本の金融商品取引法に基づく投資助言・代理業ではなく、特定の有価証券の売買その他の取引の勧誘・推奨を目的とするものではありません。本資料は教育・研究を目的とした分析記事であり、JII(株式会社ジャパン・インベスター・インターフェース)は、本資料の内容に基づく投資判断について一切の責任を負いません。投資の判断はご自身の責任と独立した調査に基づいて行ってください。

All Compounder Profiles · Methodology Japan Investor Interface Co., Ltd.