J|I Japan Investor Interface · Compounder Profile
TSE STANDARD · 2477 · FY end JUN 手間いらず株式会社
Temairazu, Inc.
Subscription software that lets hotels manage every booking site from one screen
Last Close
¥2,146Jun 5, 2026
−46% from Aug-24 peak · at a two-year low
Market Cap / EV
¥13.9bn / ¥7.5bn EV
net cash ¥6.4bn (46% of cap) · zero debt
EV / EBIT · forward
4.6x
vs domestic peers ~13–38x · FY26E OP ¥1.64bn
ROCE · trailing
26%
ROE 16% · ex-cash the operating returns are triple-digit
Op Margin · group
73% · grp
FY25 73.6% · FY26E guide 69% · ~41 employees
Shares & Float
6.48M sh · ~24% float
founder/68k ~62% · treasury 7.5% · Hikari 6.7%
INTRODUCTION

What does Temairazu do?

Temairazu sells one product that matters. Its TEMAIRAZU service is a booking site controller — software a hotel or ryokan uses to manage its room inventory and prices across many online travel agencies (OTAs) such as Rakuten Travel, Jalan and Booking.com, plus its own website, from a single screen.

Customers pay a monthly subscription. About three-quarters of revenue is a fixed monthly fee — a base charge plus options — and the rest is a variable fee that rises with the number of reservations a property takes. The company keeps churn low and signs new properties each year, so the fixed base compounds while the variable slice tracks Japan's inbound-tourism boom.

The business matters because it is mission-critical and almost free to run. A hotel that routes every distribution channel through TEMAIRAZU does not switch lightly. With roughly 41 employees and no factories, the company turned ¥2.19bn of FY2025 revenue into ¥1.61bn of operating profit — a 73% operating margin — and converts nearly all of it to cash.

Those economics have compounded quietly. Revenue and operating profit have risen every year; operating profit reached ¥1.61bn in FY2025, up 8.9%; and the balance sheet holds ¥6.4bn of net cash against no debt. Return on equity is only 16%, but that is the idle cash talking — the operating business itself earns triple-digit returns on the capital it actually uses.

So why does the stock sit at a two-year low — its operating business valued at just 4.6 times yearly operating profit (4.6x EV/EBIT) — with net cash equal to 46% of its market value? That is the question this profile works through: first how the price arrived here, then the three debates that set the multiple, the levers that could close the gap, and finally what the parts are worth.

01 · PRICE REGIME

What has driven the stock over the past two years?

Over 24 months the shares fell 28% while TOPIX rose 44%. The move is not an earnings story — operating profit set records throughout — but a multiple that fell from the low-teens to about 4.6x EV/EBIT. The chart splits the period into four regimes; the pins beneath it trace them.

2477 vs TOPIX · 24 months · daily candles + volume
Peak ¥3,955 · 2024-08-01 Trough ¥2,101 · 2026-06-03 Today ¥2,146
Temairazu · daily candles 60-day SMA TOPIX rebased (1308.T) Volume

01 · PEAK REGIME Through the summer of 2024 the shares traded around ¥3,500–3,955, reaching ¥3,955 on August 1, 2024. FY2024 had just delivered revenue up 11.9% and operating profit up 10.9%, and inbound demand was setting records. At the peak the market valued the operating business in the low-teens on EV/EBIT — already modest for a 73%-margin franchise, but supported by the record-tourism story and the hope that the cash pile would be returned.

02 · MULTIPLE COMPRESSION From August 2024 the shares fell for twenty-two months to a two-year low of ¥2,101 on June 3, 2026. Earnings did not fall — operating profit kept climbing to fresh highs — so the move was almost entirely the multiple. Small-cap and growth stocks were sold across Tokyo; investors questioned how much of the variable, reservation-linked revenue was cyclical; and a free float near 24% left few buyers to absorb the selling.

03 · CAPITAL-RETURN PIVOT As the price fell, management leaned harder on buybacks. A ¥800mn program authorized in September 2025 bought its full 260,000-share cap for ¥793mn by May 2026, and the dividend rose from ¥34 to ¥38. The shares still found little support, but the cash was now visibly being returned rather than only accumulating.

04 · CURRENT On June 5, 2026 the company launched a fresh buyback of up to 130,000 shares — about 2.2% of shares outstanding excluding treasury — capped at ¥300mn. The stock closed at ¥2,146: near its two-year low, ~4.6x forward EV/EBIT, with net cash worth 46% of the market value. The next four quarters turn on one question — what makes the market pay a higher multiple, and whether the founder returns enough cash to force it.

02 · CONTENTION

Live Investor Debates

Three debates set the multiple. Each is visible in the filings, in the price action, and in the gap between this franchise and how the market values it.

DEBATE 01 · THE MULTIPLE
Why does a 73%-margin, net-cash compounder trade at ~4.6x EV/EBIT and a two-year low?

EV/EBIT values only the operating business; it strips out the ¥6.4bn of net cash. So 4.6x is the market's price for the booking-site-controller engine alone — the debate is whether that price reflects the franchise or a discount for control and liquidity.

BULL The compression overshot. Operating profit is at a record, about 75% of revenue is recurring, churn stays low, and each buyback now retires stock near a two-year low, where it adds the most per share. Even a move toward the cheapest quality peer — Kakaku.com at ~13x EV/EBIT — would more than double the equity, and the operating business at 9–11x plus the cash already implies a value well above today's price. The bull view holds if the multiple widens toward peers as the share count falls.
BEAR It is a value trap. The free float is only ~24%, the founder controls ~62% through 68k Inc. and his own holding, and there is no growth story beyond a finite domestic hotel base. Cheap, illiquid, founder-locked stocks can stay cheap for years, and buybacks of ¥0.3–0.8bn are too small to move a ¥13.9bn market cap. The bear view holds if EV/EBIT is still stuck near 4–5x at FY2026 results despite the new buyback.
DEBATE 02 · GROWTH RUNWAY
Is growth durable, or is the domestic hotel-market ceiling close?

Fixed revenue grows as Temairazu signs net-new properties and lifts the fee per property; the variable slice rises with reservation volume. Both ultimately depend on a finite number of Japanese accommodation facilities and on the inbound-tourism cycle.

BULL Inbound tourism is at records and a site controller is now indispensable as hotels fight a labor shortage. Temairazu keeps adding OTA links — Klook, Hopper, Nuitée, ANA's Universal MaaS — and up-sells automation, including TEMAIRAZU Auto and the first domestic tie-up with IDeaS' G3 revenue-management system, which lift revenue per property at almost no added cost. The bull view holds if fixed-revenue growth stays around 8% or better as revenue per property rises.
BEAR The property count is finite and the law of large numbers is showing. Nine-month FY2026 operating profit grew 6.6% against revenue up 9.8% — cost is rising faster than sales as the company finally invests in people and development — and full-year guidance implies operating profit up just 1.9%. No overseas or adjacent business has been disclosed to extend the runway. The bear view holds if FY2026 operating profit lands at or below the 1.9% guide.
DEBATE 03 · THE CASH
Will the founder return the idle cash, or compound it as dead weight?

Net cash of ¥6.4bn is about 46% of the market value and earns almost nothing, pulling reported return on equity down to 16% and ROCE to 26%. The operating business needs almost none of it, so what happens to that cash largely decides the multiple.

BULL The cash is already being returned, and cheaply. Two buybacks in a year — ¥793mn completed and ¥300mn just launched — plus a dividend guided up to ¥40 show intent, and every share bought near a two-year low lifts per-share value. A founder who owns ~62% is the holder most aligned with a rising per-share figure. The bull view holds if FY2026 results bring a larger or formula-based buyback, or a special dividend.
BEAR The buybacks are too small to matter. At ¥0.3–0.8bn a year against ¥6.4bn of cash and about ¥1bn of annual generation, the pile keeps growing, and the company has returned cash without ever committing to a payout framework or a target balance. With ~62% control there is no outside pressure to change. The bear view holds if net cash is still rising year-on-year at FY2026.
03 · CATALYST

Capital-Efficiency Levers

Three levers could lift the multiple without a single yen of extra earnings. Each is inside management's control.

LEVER 01 · CAPITAL POLICY
Put the ¥6.4bn cash to work — bigger buyback, payout target, or special dividend
Cash vs capital returned (¥bn)
Net cash
¥6.4bn
Annual cash gen.
~¥1.0bn
Prior buyback
¥0.79bn
New buyback
¥0.30bn
buybacks so far are small against the cash pile and the yearly cash generation
Net cash equals about 46% of the market value and earns nothing, so any credible plan to shrink it re-prices the equity by arithmetic. The new ¥300mn buyback is a start, but it is dwarfed by the ¥6.4bn balance. A formula — a stated payout ratio above today's 22.5%, a target cash level, or a buyback sized to a multiple of free cash flow — would turn one-off repurchases into a policy the market can rely on. The check is the capital-return framing at FY2026 results.
Cost to mgmt
One board resolution
Earliest trigger
FY2026 results · Aug 2026
LEVER 02 · DISCLOSURE
Disclose property count, revenue per property, and churn
What the market cannot currently see
Fixed-revenue mix
~75%
Property count
undisclosed
Revenue / property
undisclosed
Churn rate
"low" · no figure
the durable half of the recurring base is asserted, not quantified
Temairazu tells investors churn is low and the fixed base grows, but never publishes the property count, the revenue per property, or a churn number. Without them the market cannot separate durable subscription growth from the cyclical, inbound-linked variable fee, so it applies the cheapest reading. A single quarterly slide showing properties and revenue per property would let investors trust the recurring engine and narrow the information discount the bear case rests on. The check is whether any of these metrics appears at a FY2026 disclosure.
Cost to mgmt
One slide per quarter
Earliest trigger
Q1 FY2027 · Nov 2026
LEVER 03 · REVENUE
Lift revenue per property through automation and revenue-management up-sell
Revenue mix · 9M FY2026
Monthly fixed
~75%
Monthly variable
~23%
Automation / RMS up-sell
growing
Internet media
~0.5%
automation and revenue management raise the fee per property at near-zero added cost
The cheapest growth is more revenue from existing customers. TEMAIRAZU Auto automates dynamic pricing and daily reporting, and the first domestic integration with IDeaS' G3 revenue-management system lets a property price its rooms more sharply — both reasons to pay Temairazu more each month. Because the cost base is near-fixed, almost all of that up-sell falls to operating profit, and layered onto the inbound-driven variable fee it is how a finite property base can still grow. The check is the fixed-fee line outgrowing property additions.
Cost to mgmt
Product investment (expensed)
Earliest trigger
Each quarterly release
04 · VALUATION

Scenario Pathways

At ¥2,146 (June 5, 2026), against FY2026 company operating-profit guidance of ¥1.64bn, an enterprise value of ~¥7.5bn implies about 4.6x forward EV/EBIT. The three scenarios below are JII estimates, not company guidance.

BEAR SCENARIO
¥1,800 – ¥2,100
−16% to −2%
implied multiple · ~4–5x EV/EBIT (fwd)
The value-trap reading holds: the multiple stays at ~4–5x, the cash keeps earning nothing, and the market keeps a control-and-liquidity discount on a founder-locked micro-cap.
What would have to happen
  • FY2026 operating profit lands at or below the +1.9% guide.
  • No upsized buyback or payout framework; net cash still rising.
  • Free float stays near 24%; institutional demand thin.
  • Inbound-linked variable revenue softens on a stronger yen.

Even here the downside is cushioned: net cash is worth ~46% of the current market value, so the equity holds a hard floor a strategic buyer would not ignore.

BASE SCENARIO
¥2,500 – ¥3,100
+16% to +44%
implied multiple · ~7–9x EV/EBIT (fwd)
The multiple normalizes partway toward peers as buybacks shrink the share count and one lever lands — a clearer payout policy or the first operating metrics.
What would have to happen
  • Fixed revenue keeps growing ~8% on net-new properties and revenue per property.
  • Buybacks continue; the ex-treasury share count falls.
  • First disclosure of property count or revenue per property.
  • EV/EBIT widens toward the high-single digits.
BULL SCENARIO
¥3,400 – ¥3,900
+58% to +82%
implied multiple · ~9–11x EV/EBIT (fwd)
Two of the three levers land — a real capital-return framework plus operating disclosure — and the market values the franchise closer to its quality, though still below the cheapest SaaS peer.
What would have to happen
  • A formula-based payout or special dividend against the cash.
  • Property and revenue-per-property disclosure proves durable growth.
  • FY2026 operating profit beats the guide.
  • Net cash falls as buybacks accelerate.

The bull band stays just under the ¥3,955 August-2024 high. Intrinsic value can sit higher: the sum-of-parts below points to ¥3,300–4,600 once the cash is credited near full.

SUM-OF-PARTS · OPERATING BUSINESS
TEMAIRAZU booking site controller — ~99.5% of revenue
FY2026E operating profit¥1,640M
FY2026E revenue · growth¥2,365M · +8.2%
Operating margin~69% (FY25 73.6%)
Recurring mix~75% monthly fixed
Assumed EV / EBIT9–13x
Implied operating EV ~¥14.8–21.3bn at 9–13x — still below domestic peers at ~13–38x.
SUM-OF-PARTS · NET CASH + MEDIA
Cash and deposits, zero debt; plus the Hikaku.com legacy
Net cash (Q3 FY2026)¥6,393M
Interest-bearing debt¥0
Net cash / market cap46%
Internet media (Hikaku.com)~¥0 · immaterial
Allocation discount applied10–20%
Cash counted at ~¥5.1–6.4bn — a haircut for cash held under ~62% founder control; media carried at zero.
PEER MULTIPLE LADDER · trailing EV / EBIT
Domestic software & internet platforms (EDINET filings, latest annual)
Kakaku.com (2371)~13x · OPM 37%
HENNGE (4475)~25x · OPM 16%
Rakus (3923)~34x · OPM 21%
Infomart (2492)~38x · OPM 15%
Temairazu (2477)~4.6x · OPM 73%
Temairazu is the cheapest and the highest-margin; tripla (5136) is excluded — client funds on its balance sheet make EV/EBIT not meaningful.
EQUITY BRIDGE · implied value per share
Operating EV + net cash, divided by ex-treasury shares
Operating EV (9–13x FY26E OP)¥14.8–21.3bn
+ Net cash (after discount)¥5.1–6.4bn
= Implied equity value¥19.9–27.7bn
÷ ex-treasury shares5,995,073
= Implied value per share¥3,320–4,620
vs ¥2,146 close+55% to +115%
Mid-case ~¥3,840 per share. A JII estimate, not a forecast or target; buybacks raise the per-share figure as the share count falls.
Important Disclaimer · 重要なご注意

This is not investment advice.

Japan Investor Interface Co., Ltd. ("JII") is an investor-relations (IR) consultancy. JII is not a registered investment advisor, financial advisor, broker-dealer, or securities firm in any jurisdiction. JII is not registered as a Financial Instruments Business Operator (金融商品取引業者) under Japan's Financial Instruments and Exchange Act. JII does not have a 投資助言・代理業 registration and does not provide investment advice or solicit the purchase, sale, or holding of any security.

JII Compounders is an editorial publication. Each profile is an analytical study of how publicly disclosed information about a Japanese listed company has been received by the market. It is intended for educational and research purposes for IR professionals, finance students, journalists, and other readers interested in corporate disclosure practice. Nothing in this publication constitutes a recommendation, opinion, suggestion, or solicitation to buy, sell, or hold any security, derivative, or other financial instrument. Price targets, scenario ranges, multiples, and comparable-company references are illustrative of analytical method only and must not be interpreted as JII's investment opinion. JII does not have an investment opinion on any security discussed.

No reliance. The information presented may be incomplete, out of date, or incorrect. Forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain. Past price performance does not indicate future results. Estimates and scenario figures are not predictions and may not be achieved. JII makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or reliability of any information in this publication.

No fiduciary or advisory relationship. Reading this publication does not create any advisory, fiduciary, or professional relationship between you and JII. Before making any investment, tax, accounting, legal, or other decision, you should consult qualified, licensed advisors in your jurisdiction and conduct your own independent due diligence based on primary disclosures issued by the company concerned.

Conflicts & positions. JII may provide paid IR diagnostic, translation, or interpretation services to Japanese listed companies, including companies discussed in this publication. JII does not trade in or hold positions in the securities of companies profiled. Where a JII engagement exists with a profiled company, that fact will be disclosed at the top of the profile.

Trademarks & data. Company names, logos, tickers, and product names referenced are the property of their respective owners. Share-price data is licensed from third-party providers. TradingView is a trademark of TradingView, Inc. All rights reserved.

本資料は、日本の金融商品取引法に基づく投資助言・代理業ではなく、特定の有価証券の売買その他の取引の勧誘・推奨を目的とするものではありません。本資料は教育・研究を目的とした分析記事であり、JII(株式会社ジャパン・インベスター・インターフェース)は、本資料の内容に基づく投資判断について一切の責任を負いません。投資の判断はご自身の責任と独立した調査に基づいて行ってください。

All Compounder Profiles · Methodology Language: EN · JP Japan Investor Interface Co., Ltd.