J|I Japan Investor Interface · Compounder Profile
TSE STANDARD · 2477 · FY end JUN 手間いらず株式会社
Temairazu, Inc.
Subscription software that lets hotels manage every booking site from one screen
Last Close
¥2,146Jun 5, 2026
−46% from Aug-24 peak · at a two-year low
Market Cap / EV
¥13.9bn / ¥7.5bn EV
net cash ¥6.4bn (46% of cap) · zero debt
EV / EBIT · forward
4.6x
vs domestic peers ~16–33x · FY26E OP ¥1.64bn
ROCE · trailing
26%
ROE 16% · ex-cash the operating returns are triple-digit
Op Margin · group
73% · grp
FY25 73.6% · FY26E guide 69% · ~41 employees
Shares & Float
6.48M sh · ~24% float
founder/68k ~62% · treasury 7.5% · Hikari 6.7%
INTRODUCTION

What does Temairazu do?

Temairazu provides TEMAIRAZU, software used by hotels and ryokan to manage room inventory and prices across multiple booking channels from one screen. Those channels include online travel agencies such as Rakuten Travel, Jalan, and Booking.com, as well as the property's own website.

Customers pay mainly through monthly fees. About three-quarters of revenue comes from fixed monthly charges, including the base fee and optional services. The rest comes from variable fees linked to reservation volume. This means the business has a recurring subscription base, with an additional revenue layer that rises when customer booking volume increases.

The product matters because it sits inside the hotel's daily sales process. Once a property uses TEMAIRAZU to manage many booking channels, switching systems would create operational risk. That keeps churn low and lets new customer additions build on the existing revenue base.

The economics are unusual. In FY2025, Temairazu generated ¥2.19bn of revenue and ¥1.61bn of operating profit, a 73% operating margin. The company has roughly 41 employees, no manufacturing assets, and very little capital required to run the business, so most operating profit turns into cash. Reported return on equity is only 16%, mainly because the large cash balance lowers it; returns on the operating capital actually required by the business appear to be much higher.

The stock does not reflect that quality. At ¥2,146 on June 5, 2026, the operating business was valued at about 4.6x forward EV/EBIT (enterprise value divided by forecast operating profit), while net cash was equal to roughly 46% of the market value. The valuation question is why the market is applying such a low multiple to a business with recurring revenue, high margins, and a large net cash balance. This profile looks at that question in four steps: how the share price reached this level, what investors are debating, what management could do to narrow the discount, and what the operating business and the cash could be worth.

01 · PRICE REGIME

What has driven the stock over the past two years?

Over 24 months the shares fell 28% while TOPIX rose 44%. The share-price decline was not caused by falling earnings — operating profit set records throughout. It came mainly from a lower valuation multiple, from the low-teens to about 4.6x EV/EBIT. The markers below the chart show the four periods.

2477 vs TOPIX · 24 months · daily candles + volume
Peak ¥3,955 · 2024-08-01 Trough ¥2,101 · 2026-06-03 Today ¥2,146
Temairazu · daily candles 60-day SMA TOPIX rebased (1308.T) Volume

01 · When investors still paid for the tourism-growth story Through the summer of 2024 the shares traded around ¥3,500–3,955, reaching ¥3,955 on August 1, 2024. FY2024 had just delivered revenue up 11.9% and operating profit up 10.9%, and inbound demand was at record levels. At the peak the operating business was valued in the low-teens on EV/EBIT — already modest for a business with 73% margins, but investors were still willing to pay for the record-tourism growth story and expected management to return more of the cash balance to shareholders.

02 · When the multiple fell despite record profit From August 2024 the shares fell for twenty-two months to a two-year low of ¥2,101 on June 3, 2026. Operating profit continued to reach new highs, so the share-price decline came mainly from the valuation multiple. Small-cap and growth stocks were sold across Tokyo; investors questioned how much of the variable, reservation-linked revenue was cyclical; and the limited free float near 24% meant there were not enough natural buyers when holders sold.

03 · When management began returning more cash As the share price fell, management increased buyback activity. A ¥800mn program authorized in September 2025 bought its full 260,000-share cap for ¥793mn by May 2026, and the dividend rose from ¥34 to ¥38. The share price remained weak, but management had started to return cash instead of only letting it build on the balance sheet.

04 · Where the stock stands now The stock closed at ¥2,146 on Friday, June 5, 2026 — near its two-year low, about 4.6x forward EV/EBIT, with net cash worth 46% of the market value. After the close that day the company announced a new buyback of up to 130,000 shares — about 2.2% of shares outstanding excluding treasury — capped at ¥300mn, with purchases running from June 8 to October 30. The next four quarters depend mainly on one question — what would make investors assign a higher multiple, and whether larger capital returns are enough to change the valuation.

02 · CONTENTION

Live Investor Debates

Three investor debates explain why the multiple is low. They appear in the company's disclosures, the share-price decline, and the gap between the quality of the business and its valuation.

DEBATE 01 · VALUATION
Why is the operating business valued so cheaply?

EV/EBIT looks at the operating business after removing net cash; it strips out the ¥6.4bn of net cash. So 4.6x is the market's price for the TEMAIRAZU operating business alone — the debate is whether that price reflects the quality of the business or a discount for founder control and limited liquidity.

BULL The bull case is that the multiple has fallen too far. Operating profit is at a record, about 75% of revenue is recurring, and churn stays low. Buybacks are more accretive when the share price is low, because the same cash retires more shares. A move toward the lowest-multiple peer, HENNGE at ~16x EV/EBIT, would more than double the equity, and the operating business at 9–11x plus the cash already implies a value above today's price. The key evidence would be the multiple widening toward peers as the share count falls.
BEAR The bear case is that the low multiple may persist. The free float is only ~24%, the founder controls ~62% through 68k Inc. and his own holding, and no growth source beyond the domestic hotel base has been disclosed. Stocks with founder control and limited free float can stay cheap for years, and buybacks of ¥0.3–0.8bn are too small relative to the ¥13.9bn market value to change investor perception. It would be confirmed if EV/EBIT is still near 4–5x at FY2026 results.
DEBATE 02 · GROWTH
How much growth is left in the domestic hotel market?

Fixed revenue grows as Temairazu signs net-new properties and raises the fee per property; variable revenue rises with reservation volume. Both depend on how many accommodation facilities in Japan can still be added, and on the inbound-tourism cycle.

BULL Inbound tourism has reached record levels, and labor shortages make it more valuable for hotels to reduce manual work across booking channels. Temairazu keeps adding OTA links — Klook, Hopper, Nuitée, ANA's Universal MaaS — and sells additional automation functions, including TEMAIRAZU Auto and the first domestic tie-up with IDeaS' G3 revenue-management system, which can raise revenue per customer without much additional cost. Watch whether fixed-revenue growth holds around 8% or better as revenue per property rises.
BEAR The bear case is that the available domestic customer base may be getting harder to expand. Nine-month FY2026 operating profit grew 6.6% against revenue up 9.8% — costs are rising faster than revenue as the company invests more in people and development — and full-year guidance implies operating profit up just 1.9%. The company has not disclosed an overseas or adjacent business that would create a new growth source. It would be confirmed if FY2026 operating profit lands at or below the 1.9% guide.
DEBATE 03 · CAPITAL ALLOCATION
What will management do with the cash?

Net cash of ¥6.4bn is about 46% of the market value and appears to earn little return, pulling reported return on equity down to 16% and ROCE to 26%. Investors are likely to value the company differently depending on whether that cash is returned, invested, or left idle.

BULL The bull case is that management has started to return cash while the share price is low. Two buybacks in a year — ¥793mn completed and ¥300mn just launched — plus a dividend guided up to ¥40 show intent, and every share bought near a two-year low raises per-share value. A founder who owns ~62% is the largest beneficiary of higher per-share value. Watch for a larger or formula-based buyback, or a special dividend, at FY2026 results.
BEAR The bear case is that the buybacks are still too small to reduce the cash balance meaningfully. At ¥0.3–0.8bn a year against ¥6.4bn of cash and about ¥1bn of annual generation, the cash balance can continue to rise, and the company has returned cash without committing to a payout framework or a target balance. With ~62% founder control, minority shareholders may have limited ability to push for a different policy. It would be confirmed if net cash is still rising year-on-year at FY2026.
03 · CATALYST

Capital-Efficiency Levers

The multiple could rise even without higher earnings if management reduces the reasons for the current discount. All three changes below depend mainly on management decisions.

LEVER 01 · CAPITAL POLICY
Set a clear policy for the ¥6.4bn cash balance
Cash vs capital returned (¥bn)
Net cash
¥6.4bn
Annual cash gen.
~¥1.0bn
Prior buyback
¥0.79bn
New buyback
¥0.30bn
buybacks so far are small compared with both the cash balance and annual cash generation
Net cash equals about 46% of the market value and earns little return, so a credible plan to reduce it would increase the value attributed to shareholders if investors believe the cash will be returned. The new ¥300mn buyback is a start, but it is small next to the ¥6.4bn balance. A stated payout ratio above today's 22.5%, a target cash level, or a buyback sized to a multiple of free cash flow would turn one-off repurchases into a policy investors can rely on. The next check is whether FY2026 results include a clearer capital-return policy.
Cost to mgmt
One board resolution
Earliest trigger
FY2026 results · Aug 2026
LEVER 02 · DISCLOSURE
Disclose property count, revenue per property, and churn
The operating metrics investors cannot currently see
Fixed-revenue mix
~75%
Property count
undisclosed
Revenue / property
undisclosed
Churn rate
"low" · no figure
the company says the recurring base is durable, but discloses no metrics to verify it
The company says churn is low and the fixed base grows, but does not disclose the property count, the revenue per property, or a churn number. Without these metrics, investors cannot tell how much growth comes from recurring monthly fees and how much from reservation volume linked to inbound tourism, so they may value the business on the more conservative reading. A single quarterly slide showing properties and revenue per property would let investors verify the recurring revenue base and reduce the discount caused by limited disclosure. The next check is whether any of these metrics appears in a FY2026 disclosure.
Cost to mgmt
One slide per quarter
Earliest trigger
Q1 FY2027 · Nov 2026
LEVER 03 · REVENUE
Increase revenue per property by selling automation and revenue-management functions
Revenue mix · 9M FY2026
Monthly fixed
~75%
Monthly variable
~23%
Automation / RMS up-sell
growing
Internet media
~0.5%
automation and revenue-management tools can raise monthly fees without adding much cost
The lowest-cost growth path is to earn more from existing customers. TEMAIRAZU Auto automates dynamic pricing and daily reporting, and the first domestic integration with IDeaS' G3 revenue-management system helps a property set room prices more effectively — both reasons to pay Temairazu more each month. Because the cost base is near-fixed, much of the additional revenue could flow through to operating profit; combined with variable fees that rise with reservation volume, this is how revenue can keep growing even where the domestic property count is limited. The check is whether fixed-fee revenue grows faster than customer additions, once the company discloses those metrics.
Cost to mgmt
Product investment (expensed)
Earliest trigger
Each quarterly release
04 · VALUATION

Scenario Pathways

At ¥2,146 (June 5, 2026), using company guidance for FY2026 operating profit of ¥1.64bn, an enterprise value of ~¥7.5bn implies about 4.6x forward EV/EBIT. The three scenarios below are JII estimates, not company guidance.

BEAR SCENARIO
¥1,800 – ¥2,100
−16% to −2%
implied multiple · ~4–5x EV/EBIT (fwd)
In the bear case, the market continues to treat Temairazu as a value trap: the multiple stays at ~4–5x, the cash continues to earn little return, and a discount for founder control and limited free float remains.
What would have to happen
  • FY2026 operating profit lands at or below the +1.9% guide.
  • No upsized buyback or payout framework; net cash still rising.
  • Free float stays near 24%; institutional demand thin.
  • A stronger yen weakens inbound demand, reducing reservation-linked variable revenue.

Even in this case, net cash limits the downside to some extent: it is worth ~46% of the current market value, a large cash balance that would matter in any strategic valuation.

BASE SCENARIO
¥2,500 – ¥3,100
+16% to +44%
implied multiple · ~7–9x EV/EBIT (fwd)
The multiple moves closer to peer multiples, but does not fully close the gap, as buybacks reduce the share count and management delivers one clear improvement — better disclosure or a clearer payout policy.
What would have to happen
  • Fixed revenue keeps growing ~8% on net-new properties and revenue per property.
  • Buybacks continue; the number of shares outstanding excluding treasury falls.
  • First disclosure of property count or revenue per property.
  • EV/EBIT widens toward the high-single digits.
BULL SCENARIO
¥3,400 – ¥3,900
+58% to +82%
implied multiple · ~9–11x EV/EBIT (fwd)
Management delivers two of the three changes above — a stated capital-return policy plus better operating disclosure — and investors assign a multiple closer to businesses with similar margins and recurring revenue, though still below the lowest-multiple SaaS peer.
What would have to happen
  • A formula-based payout or special dividend against the cash.
  • Property and revenue-per-property disclosure proves durable growth.
  • FY2026 operating profit beats the guide.
  • Net cash falls as buybacks accelerate.

The bull band stays just under the ¥3,955 August-2024 high. The implied fundamental value could be higher: the sum-of-parts below points to ¥3,300–4,600 if investors give most of the cash balance full value.

SUM-OF-PARTS · OPERATING BUSINESS
TEMAIRAZU booking site controller — ~99.5% of revenue
FY2026E operating profit¥1,640M
FY2026E revenue · growth¥2,365M · +8.2%
Operating margin~69% (FY25 73.6%)
Recurring mix~75% monthly fixed
Assumed EV / EBIT9–13x
Implied operating EV ~¥14.8–21.3bn at 9–13x — still below domestic peers at ~16–33x.
SUM-OF-PARTS · NET CASH + MEDIA
Cash and deposits, zero debt; plus the legacy Hikaku.com internet-media business
Net cash (Q3 FY2026)¥6,393M
Interest-bearing debt¥0
Net cash / market cap46%
Internet media (Hikaku.com)~¥0 · immaterial
Allocation discount applied10–20%
Cash counted at ~¥5.1–6.4bn — a haircut for cash held under ~62% founder control; JII assigns no value to the media business.
PEER MULTIPLE LADDER · trailing EV / EBIT
Domestic software & internet platforms (EDINET filings, latest annual OP · live EV at 2026-06-09 close)
Kakaku.com (2371)~21x · OPM 37%
HENNGE (4475)~16x · OPM 16%
Rakus (3923)~33x · OPM 21%
Infomart (2492)~27x · OPM 15%
Temairazu (2477)~4.6x · OPM 73%
Temairazu is the cheapest and the highest-margin; tripla (5136) is excluded because client funds on its balance sheet distort enterprise value, making EV/EBIT less useful.
EQUITY BRIDGE · implied value per share
Operating EV + net cash, divided by ex-treasury shares
Operating EV (9–13x FY26E OP)¥14.8–21.3bn
+ Net cash (after discount)¥5.1–6.4bn
= Implied equity value¥19.9–27.7bn
÷ ex-treasury shares5,995,073
= Implied value per share¥3,320–4,620
vs ¥2,146 close+55% to +115%
Mid-case ~¥3,840 per share. A JII estimate, not a forecast or target; buybacks would increase the implied value per share if they reduce the share count below this assumption.
Important Disclaimer · 重要なご注意

This is not investment advice.

Japan Investor Interface Co., Ltd. ("JII") is an investor-relations (IR) consultancy. JII is not a registered investment advisor, financial advisor, broker-dealer, or securities firm in any jurisdiction. JII is not registered as a Financial Instruments Business Operator (金融商品取引業者) under Japan's Financial Instruments and Exchange Act. JII does not have a 投資助言・代理業 registration and does not provide investment advice or solicit the purchase, sale, or holding of any security.

JII Compounders is an editorial publication. Each profile is an analytical study of how publicly disclosed information about a Japanese listed company has been received by the market. It is intended for educational and research purposes for IR professionals, finance students, journalists, and other readers interested in corporate disclosure practice. Nothing in this publication constitutes a recommendation, opinion, suggestion, or solicitation to buy, sell, or hold any security, derivative, or other financial instrument. Price targets, scenario ranges, multiples, and comparable-company references are illustrative of analytical method only and must not be interpreted as JII's investment opinion. JII does not have an investment opinion on any security discussed.

No reliance. The information presented may be incomplete, out of date, or incorrect. Forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain. Past price performance does not indicate future results. Estimates and scenario figures are not predictions and may not be achieved. JII makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or reliability of any information in this publication.

No fiduciary or advisory relationship. Reading this publication does not create any advisory, fiduciary, or professional relationship between you and JII. Before making any investment, tax, accounting, legal, or other decision, you should consult qualified, licensed advisors in your jurisdiction and conduct your own independent due diligence based on primary disclosures issued by the company concerned.

Conflicts & positions. JII may provide paid IR diagnostic, translation, or interpretation services to Japanese listed companies, including companies discussed in this publication. JII does not trade in or hold positions in the securities of companies profiled. Where a JII engagement exists with a profiled company, that fact will be disclosed at the top of the profile.

Trademarks & data. Company names, logos, tickers, and product names referenced are the property of their respective owners. Share-price data is licensed from third-party providers. TradingView is a trademark of TradingView, Inc. All rights reserved.

本資料は、日本の金融商品取引法に基づく投資助言・代理業ではなく、特定の有価証券の売買その他の取引の勧誘・推奨を目的とするものではありません。本資料は教育・研究を目的とした分析記事であり、JII(株式会社ジャパン・インベスター・インターフェース)は、本資料の内容に基づく投資判断について一切の責任を負いません。投資の判断はご自身の責任と独立した調査に基づいて行ってください。

All Compounder Profiles · Methodology Language: EN · JP Japan Investor Interface Co., Ltd.