J|I Japan Investor Interface · Compounder Profile
TSE PRIME · 2353 · FY end JUL 日本駐車場開発株式会社
Nippon Parking Development Co., Ltd.
Operates car parks, ski resorts and theme parks, turning underused land and idle assets into cash-generating businesses
Last Close
¥243Jun 8, 2026
−20% from Sep-25 peak · +40% off the Aug-24 low
Market Cap / EV
¥75.85bn / ¥71.9bn EV
cash ¥26.9bn vs debt ¥22.9bn · net cash ¥4.0bn
EV / EBIT · forward
8.5x
FY26E OP ¥8.5bn (+11%) · TTM EV/EBITDA 6.9x
ROCE · trailing
~20%
ROE fell 42→38→28% (FY23-25) · target >30%
Op Margin · group
20.8% · grp
9M segments: parking 22% · ski 27% · theme park 17%
Shares & Float
312M ex-tr · 348M issued
Tatsumi family 33% · treasury 10.4% · 16-yr dividend
INTRODUCTION

What does Nippon Parking Development do?

Nippon Parking Development (NPD) runs four businesses with the same basic model: it uses underused land and idle assets to generate revenue. The largest is parking. NPD leases parking spaces and lots from the owners of office buildings, condominiums and commercial facilities, pays owners a fixed rent, and then operates the spaces and rents them out to drivers. Because NPD usually does not buy the land, it does not need much capital to grow. The second is ski resorts, run through its listed subsidiary Nippon Ski Resort Development (6040), which operates and improves regional ski resorts in places such as Hakuba Valley. The third is theme parks and lodging, run through the subsidiary Nippon Theme Park Development and mainly in the Nasu area. The fourth is still small and includes education, healthcare and renewable-energy ventures.

NPD earns revenue in several ways. Building owners pay brokerage fees, and drivers pay to use parking spaces; ski visitors pay for lift tickets, food, lodging and lessons; theme-park guests pay for admission and lodging. Parking is steady and contract-based. The ski and theme-park businesses own physical assets and keep investing in them, so they earn more in good seasons and carry more fixed cost — which is why the business needs more owned assets and more investment as ski resorts and theme parks grow.

The business still earns strong returns, but those returns are changing. In FY2025 (year to July 2025) NPD earned ¥36.8bn of revenue and ¥7.66bn of operating profit, a 20.8% margin. Return on equity, or profit compared with shareholders' equity, has been falling as equity grows and more of the business shifts into asset-heavy leisure operations: 42.3% in FY2023, 38.0% in FY2024, 27.7% in FY2025. The company now targets keeping ROE above 30% and guides 30.1% for FY2026. It also returns most of its profit to shareholders — the FY26 total-return ratio, dividends plus buybacks divided by net income, is guided at 91.2% — and has raised its dividend for 16 straight years.

The latest numbers need some unpacking. On June 5, 2026 NPD reported record results for the first nine months of FY2026: revenue up 9.4%, operating profit up 5.6%, ordinary profit up 8.4%. Net income rose 11.6%, but a one-off ¥1.12bn gain on a land sale at the Iwatake ski resort made that growth look stronger; the better measure of operating performance is the 5.6% rise in operating profit. The same morning the company authorized a ¥1.0bn buyback and repeated its target of keeping ROE above 30%. Yet the shares are still about 20% below their September-2025 peak, at roughly 8.5x forward EV/EBIT (enterprise value divided by forecast operating profit). The valuation question is whether investors are valuing a high-return compounder that returns a lot of cash to shareholders too cheaply, or are right to value it as a company with debt and exposure to cyclical leisure demand whose ROE is falling while the founder group keeps tight control.

This profile answers that question in four steps: how the share price reached this level, what investors are debating, what management could do to reduce the valuation gap, and what the four operating businesses and the balance sheet could be worth.

01 · PRICE REGIME

What has driven the stock over the past two years?

NPD uses underused land and idle assets to generate revenue. Its parking business leases spaces from owners and rents them to drivers, so it owns very few assets and earns high returns; its ski resorts and theme parks own the assets they run, so they can earn more in good seasons but require more capital.

2353 vs TOPIX · 24 months · daily candles + volume
Peak ¥303 · 2025-09-10 Trough ¥234 · 2026-06-04 Today ¥243
Nippon Parking Development · daily candles 60-day SMA TOPIX rebased (1308.T) Volume

01 · The rise to the September-2025 peak Through the summer of 2025 the shares climbed to ¥303 on September 10, 2025 — about 76% above the August-2024 low of ¥172. FY2025 had just delivered record results: revenue up 12.7% to ¥36.8bn and operating profit up 18.5% to ¥7.66bn, helped by a record ski season for inbound visitors. At the peak investors valued the operating business at roughly 11x forward EV/EBIT — that valuation assumed continued double-digit growth and rising shareholder returns.

02 · The stock fell even as profit hit records From September 2025 the shares fell to a two-year low of ¥234 on June 4, 2026. Operating profit kept setting records, so the stock fell because investors paid a lower multiple, which fell from about 11x to 8.5x forward EV/EBIT. Investors sold small-cap and growth stocks across the Tokyo market; NPD borrowed ¥4.8bn more for ski and theme-park projects, so its equity ratio fell from 38.3% to 32.6% and interest expense rose; and ski operating profit fell 4.5% because investment costs rose, even though that segment's revenue hit a record.

03 · Management increased shareholder returns As the price fell, management increased shareholder returns. The dividend rose from ¥8.00 to a guided ¥9.00 — the 16th straight annual increase — and the FY26 total-return ratio (dividends plus buybacks over net income) is guided at 91.2%. NPD launched two buybacks in quick succession: a ¥1.5bn program resolved March 6, 2026 finished on May 13, and a fresh ¥1.0bn program was authorized on June 5. Management restated its aim of holding return on equity above 30%, and buybacks help because they reduce the equity base.

04 · Where the stock is now The stock closed at ¥243 on June 8, 2026, near its two-year low, at about 8.5x forward EV/EBIT. After reporting record nine-month results on June 5, the company authorized a ¥1.0bn buyback of up to 4,000,000 shares — about 1.28% of shares outstanding excluding treasury — to run from July 17 to September 30. The next four quarters depend on one question: whether the market values NPD as a cyclical leisure operator or as a high-return compounder, which its returns still suggest it could be.

02 · CONTENTION

Investor Debates

Three debates explain the gap between NPD's record results and its lower share price. They are about the valuation multiple, the durability of growth across steady and cyclical businesses, and whether ROE above 30% reflects real operating strength or buybacks and leverage under founder control.

DEBATE 01 · VALUATION
Is this a cyclical leisure operator or a high-return compounder?

EV/EBIT shows how investors value the operating business after adjusting for cash and debt. At ¥243 that multiple is about 8.5x — close to the multiples investors usually pay for leisure companies. The debate is whether a business that still earns high returns, but whose return on equity has fallen from 42% to 28%, should trade at that leisure-sector multiple or at a higher multiple.

BULL Bulls focus on NPD's high returns. ROE has stayed above 27% for years, revenue, operating profit, ordinary profit and net income all reached records again in the FY26 nine months, and the dividend has risen for 16 straight years. NPD earns nearly 50% on the capital used in its operations, excluding cash and securities. The multiple fell from about 11x at the September-2025 peak to 8.5x with no fall in operating profit, and buybacks retire more shares at the lower price. The bull case gets stronger if FY26 operating profit meets the ¥8.5bn guidance and the multiple widens back toward 10x.
BEAR Bears think the lower multiple is justified. ROE has slid from 42.3% to 27.7% in two years as ski resorts and theme parks become a larger part of the business, two of the four businesses depend on weather and tourism, and the company carries ¥22.9bn of debt. Domestic and overseas leisure and parking peers trade at roughly 5–11x EV/EBITDA, so the September multiple may have been too high, rather than today's multiple being too low. The bear case is stronger if the multiple stays near 8x at FY26 results and ski or theme-park profit slips on a poor season.
DEBATE 02 · GROWTH & CYCLE
Can growth last, and can NPD repeat the regional model?

Parking revenue grows when NPD adds new spaces and raises fees; ski and theme-park revenue rises when visitor numbers and ticket prices increase. Parking is steady and contract-based; the leisure segments depend more on inbound tourism and weather. The debate is how much of the recent growth can continue, and whether the regional-revitalization playbook can repeat outside Nasu.

BULL Bulls argue that the records are not coming from one business alone. All three major segments grew nine-month revenue. Parking, the steadiest business, added 118 net new domestic properties to 1,630 managed at a 93.8% contract rate, while running Japan's monthly-parking search site with the most listings. Inbound ski visitors hit a record 543,000, up 23%, and rising labor costs push more owners to outsource parking to NPD. The bull case is stronger if parking keeps adding properties and spending by inbound visitors keeps growing through FY27.
BEAR Bears focus on the parts of the business that depend on the cycle and are not yet proven. Ski operating profit fell 4.5% over nine months because costs rose during a warm winter with little snow, and a stronger yen would hit inbound spending. Group operating profit grew only 5.6% against 9.4% revenue growth, so costs are rising faster than sales. NPD now needs new regions and acquisitions to support growth, yet the company deferred the planned IPO of its theme-park unit on April 3, 2026, saying NPD has not yet shown that it can repeat the Nasu model elsewhere. The bear case is confirmed if FY26 operating profit falls below the ¥8.5bn guidance.
DEBATE 03 · CAPITAL ALLOCATION
Does the 30% ROE come from operating strength, or from buybacks and leverage?

Buybacks reduce the equity base used to calculate ROE, so they can lift ROE even when operating returns are flat or falling. With the founder vehicle owning about a third of the shares, the debate is whether ROE above 30% shows a stronger business or mainly reflects buybacks and debt that also tightens family control.

BULL Bulls point to NPD's long record of shareholder returns. The dividend has risen for 16 years, the FY26 total-return ratio is guided at 91.2%, and the ¥1.5bn buyback that finished in May was followed immediately by a new ¥1.0bn program on June 5. Management targets return on equity above 30%, which buybacks support by shrinking equity. Because every repurchase near a multi-year low lifts per-share value, minority shareholders benefit as well. The bull case gets stronger if FY26 results include a formal payout policy or a larger buyback.
BEAR Bears think management is using buybacks and debt to support ROE. ROE has still fallen to 27.7%, even though buybacks and higher debt should support it, while ski operating margin dropped 3.8 points and the equity ratio fell to 32.6%; the 11.6% net-income growth looked stronger because of a one-off ¥1.12bn land-sale gain, rather than stronger operating profit. The founder vehicle holds about a third of the votes, and each buyback raises its stake without a tender. The bear case is right if operating margins keep falling while buybacks and leverage keep reported ROE from falling further.
03 · CATALYST

Ways to Improve the Valuation

Investors could pay a higher multiple even if earnings do not rise, if management addresses the concerns that keep the valuation low. Management can make most of these changes itself, or explain them more clearly.

LEVER 01 · CAPITAL POLICY
Make the rising payout a clear capital-return policy
FY26 capital return (¥bn) and total payout ratio
Net income (FY26E)
¥5.7bn
Dividends (FY26E)
¥2.8bn
Buybacks (FY26E)
¥2.6bn
Total-return ratio
91.2%
dividends plus buybacks return 91.2% of FY26 net income; the dividend has risen 16 years running
NPD already returns most of its profit — a 49.3% dividend payout, a 14.4% dividend-on-equity, and uses buybacks for the rest — but the policy is decided year by year. It has not published a target payout, a formal written ROE target outside the briefing materials, or a clear plan for how much treasury stock it will hold. Because it carries 10.4% of its shares in treasury and aims for ROE above 30%, a stated framework — and cancellation of treasury stock — would help investors treat shareholder returns as a policy, not a year-by-year decision. The next check is whether FY26 results in September add one.
Cost to mgmt
One board resolution
Earliest trigger
FY26 results · Sep 2026
LEVER 02 · OPERATIONS
Show that ski and theme-park investment is starting to pay off
9M FY26 segment operating profit, YoY
Parking
¥3.1bn · +10%
Ski resorts
¥2.7bn · −4.5%
Theme parks
¥1.1bn · +31%
ski profit fell because NPD is investing, not because demand is weakening; theme-park profit rose 31% as the same model scales
Ski operating profit fell 4.5% over nine months, but the cause is investment, not decline: new gondolas, snow machines and wage increases to serve a visitor base driven by inbound tourists, which reached a record. The theme-park business uses the same model of improving regional leisure assets, and lifted operating profit 31% with record lodging. The company deferred that unit's IPO in April 2026 because it wants to prove the model before listing it; showing that these assets can attract visitors throughout the year and be used more often — revenue outside the ski season, premium services, the Izu rollout — would help investors see whether lower margins are temporary investment costs or a real profitability problem. The check is whether ski and theme-park margins recover as the current investment cycle ends.
Cost to mgmt
Capex (already underway)
Earliest trigger
Each quarterly release
LEVER 03 · REVENUE
Keep adding parking properties and repeat the regional model
Domestic parking footprint · 9M FY26
Managed properties
1,630
Net new (9M)
+118
Contract rate
93.8%
Regional model
Nasu → Izu
parking can grow without NPD owning the land; NPD is taking the Nasu model to Izu
Parking needs the least capital to grow. NPD added 118 net new domestic properties to 1,630 managed at a 93.8% contract rate, guarantees owners rent, and re-lets the spaces — a contract-based, asset-light stream that grows as labor costs push more owners to outsource. Alongside it, the theme-park arm is taking its Nasu model of revitalizing regional assets into Izu from March 2026. If parking keeps compounding net additions and the regional model scales, group revenue can grow on capital the company does not have to own. The check is steady net-property additions through FY27.
Cost to mgmt
Sales effort, paid through expenses
Earliest trigger
Each quarterly release
04 · VALUATION

Valuation Scenarios

At ¥243 (June 8, 2026), based on FY26 operating-profit guidance of ¥8.5bn, an enterprise value of about ¥71.9bn implies roughly 8.5x forward EV/EBIT. The three scenarios below are JII estimates, not company guidance.

BEAR SCENARIO
¥200 – ¥235
−18% to −3%
implied multiple · ~7–8x EV/EBIT (fwd)
In the bear case, investors continue to value NPD as a cyclical leisure and parking company. The multiple stays near 7–8x, a poor ski season or stronger yen hurts the tourism-related businesses, and investors keep applying a discount because NPD has ¥22.9bn of debt and remains under founder control.
What would have to happen
  • FY26 operating profit at or below the ¥8.5bn guide.
  • Warm winter or stronger yen cuts inbound spending.
  • No payout framework; net debt rises with buybacks.
  • The EV/EBIT multiple stays at a leisure-sector level of 7–8x.

Even here, the 16-year dividend record and guided 91% payout limit the downside; the September-2025 multiple of about 11x looks like the high point of the cycle.

BASE SCENARIO
¥285 – ¥320
+17% to +32%
implied multiple · ~10–11x EV/EBIT (fwd)
Investors raise the multiple to better reflect the company's high returns as buybacks shrink the share count and investors give more credit to NPD's record of returning cash. Parking keeps adding net properties, inbound spending stays firm, and management sets a clearer payout policy.
What would have to happen
  • Parking keeps adding properties and raising fees, helping group revenue grow about 10%.
  • Buybacks reduce the number of shares excluding treasury stock.
  • FY26 operating profit meets the ¥8.5bn guide.
  • The EV/EBIT multiple rises toward 10–11x.
BULL SCENARIO
¥360 – ¥410
+48% to +69%
implied multiple · ~12–13x EV/EBIT (fwd)
Investors treat NPD as a high-return compounder. Return on equity holds above 30%, the total payout stays near 90%, and inbound tourism plus the rollout of the regional leisure model drives double-digit growth. A formal payout policy and treasury cancellation reduce the discount linked to founder control.
What would have to happen
  • Return on equity sustained above 30%, total payout ratio near 90%.
  • Ski and theme-park margins recover after the capex cycle.
  • The Izu rollout and new parking properties support growth.
  • Formal capital-return framework; treasury cancelled.

The bull-case range moves back above the September-2025 high of ¥303, because investors may decide that high returns and a near-full payout deserve a premium to leisure-sector peers.

SUM-OF-PARTS · VALUE OF OPERATING SEGMENTS
Parking, ski resorts and theme parks — FY26E segment operating profit
Parking · OP ¥4,150M10–12x · ¥41.5–49.8bn
Ski resorts · OP ¥2,300M7–9x · ¥16.1–20.7bn
Theme parks · OP ¥1,800M8–10x · ¥14.4–18.0bn
Blended implied EV / EBIT~8–11x
Implied operating EV ~¥72–88.5bn. Segment profit is the company's FY26 guidance; multiples are JII assumptions, highest for asset-light parking. The small fourth segment is included in the parking valuation because it is immaterial.
SUM-OF-PARTS · CASH, SECURITIES & MINORITY
Cash, securities, debt and minority interest used in the equity bridge
Cash & deposits (Apr-26)¥26.9bn
Investment securities¥4.9bn
Interest-bearing debt−¥22.9bn
Minority interest (mainly 6040)−¥4.7bn
NPD consolidates listed Nippon Ski Resort Development (6040); the minority interest is subtracted in the bridge below.
PEER MULTIPLE LADDER · trailing EV / EBITDA
Parking, ski and leisure operators — EV / TTM EBITDA (snapshot 2026-06-09)
Park24 (4666) · parking~5.9x
Aeon Fantasy (4343) · amusement~4.9x
Nippon Ski Resort Dev (6040) · ski sub~6.5x
Fujikyuko (9010) · leisure + rail~10.1x
Vail Resorts (NYSE:MTN) · ski~10.9x
Compagnie des Alpes (EPA:CDA) · ski+parks~6.1x*
Nippon Parking Dev (2353)~7.0x
EV at the snapshot close ÷ trailing-12-month EBITDA. NPD's 7.0x multiple is in the middle of the peer group; its 8.5x forward EV/EBIT is based on NPD's FY26 operating-profit guidance. *Compagnie des Alpes EV/EBITDA not currently available; prior value shown.
EQUITY BRIDGE · implied value per share
Operating EV + cash + securities − debt − minority, divided by shares outstanding excluding treasury stock
Operating EV (8–11x segment OP)¥72.0–88.5bn
+ Cash & investment securities¥31.8bn
− Interest-bearing debt−¥22.9bn
− Minority interest−¥4.7bn
= Implied equity value¥76.2–92.7bn
÷ ex-treasury shares312,151,523
= Implied value per share¥244–297
vs ¥243 close+0% to +22%
Mid-case ~¥270. A JII estimate, not a forecast or target; if NPD trades at sector multiples, the upside is modest, and the bull case needs investors to pay a higher multiple for NPD's high returns.
Important Disclaimer · 重要なご注意

This is not investment advice.

Japan Investor Interface Co., Ltd. ("JII") is an investor-relations (IR) consultancy. JII is not a registered investment advisor, financial advisor, broker-dealer, or securities firm in any jurisdiction. JII is not registered as a Financial Instruments Business Operator (金融商品取引業者) under Japan's Financial Instruments and Exchange Act. JII does not have a 投資助言・代理業 registration and does not provide investment advice or solicit the purchase, sale, or holding of any security.

JII Compounders is an editorial publication. Each profile is an analytical study of how publicly disclosed information about a Japanese listed company has been received by the market. It is intended for educational and research purposes for IR professionals, finance students, journalists, and other readers interested in corporate disclosure practice. Nothing in this publication constitutes a recommendation, opinion, suggestion, or solicitation to buy, sell, or hold any security, derivative, or other financial instrument. Price targets, scenario ranges, multiples, and comparable-company references are illustrative of analytical method only and must not be interpreted as JII's investment opinion. JII does not have an investment opinion on any security discussed.

No reliance. The information presented may be incomplete, out of date, or incorrect. Forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain. Past price performance does not indicate future results. Estimates and scenario figures are not predictions and may not be achieved. JII makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or reliability of any information in this publication.

No fiduciary or advisory relationship. Reading this publication does not create any advisory, fiduciary, or professional relationship between you and JII. Before making any investment, tax, accounting, legal, or other decision, you should consult qualified, licensed advisors in your jurisdiction and conduct your own independent due diligence based on primary disclosures issued by the company concerned.

Conflicts & positions. JII may provide paid IR diagnostic, translation, or interpretation services to Japanese listed companies, including companies discussed in this publication. JII does not trade in or hold positions in the securities of companies profiled. Where a JII engagement exists with a profiled company, that fact will be disclosed at the top of the profile.

Trademarks & data. Company names, logos, tickers, and product names referenced are the property of their respective owners. Share-price data is licensed from third-party providers. TradingView is a trademark of TradingView, Inc. All rights reserved.

本資料は、日本の金融商品取引法に基づく投資助言・代理業ではなく、特定の有価証券の売買その他の取引の勧誘・推奨を目的とするものではありません。本資料は教育・研究を目的とした分析記事であり、JII(株式会社ジャパン・インベスター・インターフェース)は、本資料の内容に基づく投資判断について一切の責任を負いません。投資の判断はご自身の責任と独立した調査に基づいて行ってください。

All Compounder Profiles · Methodology Language: EN · JP Japan Investor Interface Co., Ltd.