J|I Japan Investor Interface · Compounder Profile
TSE PRIME · 2378 · FY end MAR 株式会社ルネサンス
RENAISSANCE INCORPORATED
Japan's total sports-club operator — fitness gyms, swimming and tennis schools, home-fitness gear and nursing-care rehab — rebuilt after an impairment-heavy stretch
Last Close
¥1,040Jul 9, 2026
−19% from the Sep-25 peak · +7% off the Jun-26 low
Market Cap / EV
¥19.7bn / ¥41.9bn EV
net debt ¥22.2bn incl. ¥14.8bn leases · 18.9M sh ex-treasury
EV / OP · incl. leases
~23x
on FY03/27 guidance OP ¥1.8bn · ~15x ex-lease · 8.5x EV/EBITDA
ROCE · trailing
3.9%
down from 4.9% in FY03/25 · ROE negative on the net loss
OP Margin · group
2.4% · grp
FY03/25 3.1% · FY03/30 plan 4.5% · 2,020 employees
Shares & Register
18.9M sh · strategic blocks ~40%
founder DIC 17.8% · Advantage 9.9% (preferred) · SOMPO 7.6%
INTRODUCTION

What does Renaissance do?

Renaissance runs sports clubs. It is one of Japan's largest total-club operators — the kind of neighborhood club that puts a gym, a swimming pool and tennis courts under one roof, alongside children's swimming and tennis schools. At the end of FY03/26 it had 442,085 members across 231 clubs, and it was spun out of the ink and chemicals maker DIC in 1979, which is still its largest shareholder at 17.8%.

Members pay a monthly subscription, so revenue is a stream of small recurring payments rather than one-off sales. Sports facilities — fitness memberships and the swimming and tennis schools — are 84.9% of the ¥64.9bn top line. The rest comes from three newer lines the company is trying to grow: home-fitness equipment sold through TV shopping and e-commerce, nursing-care rehabilitation day-service centers, and health-promotion contracts with municipalities and corporate health-insurance plans. Churn is low, about 3.2% a year.

For a decade the company grew by buying scale. It bought the rival total-club chain Tokyu Sports Oasis — consolidated as a wholly-owned subsidiary in March 2024, then absorbed in a legal merger in April 2025. That deal lifted FY03/25 revenue from ¥43.6bn to ¥63.7bn and made Renaissance the industry's largest operator by sales. It also bought the nursing-care operator Kaede-no-Kaze in December 2025 and the outdoor-fitness firm BEACH TOWN in March 2026.

Renaissance did not turn that scale into profit. FY03/26 revenue rose 1.9% YoY to ¥64.9bn, but OP fell 19.6% YoY to ¥1.57bn, a 2.4% margin — well below the 8% the company earned before COVID. Then a ¥3.06bn impairment across 38 clubs, taken to clear out unprofitable city-center stores, produced a ¥2.1bn net loss and pushed the equity ratio down to 17%. ROCE was 3.9%, below any reasonable cost of capital.

On May 8, 2026, after the market closed, president Mochizuki Misao — who took over in April 2025 — scrapped the old three-year plan and issued a 2026–2030 medium-term plan. The new plan redirects investment away from clubs and toward the lower-capital home-fitness, nursing and municipal-health lines, targeting a 4.5% OP margin and ¥3.5bn of OP by FY03/30. The investment question is whether cost reform can nearly double the margin before new lease-accounting rules cut the equity ratio toward 10% in FY03/28.

01 · PRICE REGIME

What has driven the stock over the past two years?

Membership recovery and the cost base have driven the shares.

2378 vs TOPIX · 24 months · daily candles + volume
Peak ¥1,290 · 2025-09-25 Trough ¥973 · 2026-06-04 Today ¥1,040
Renaissance · daily candles 60-day SMA TOPIX rebased (1308.T) Volume

01 · When investors paid for the merger The shares climbed from ¥960 in June 2024 to a two-year high of ¥1,290 on September 25, 2025. Renaissance consolidated Tokyu Sports Oasis in March 2024, merged it in April 2025, lifting FY03/25 revenue to ¥63.7bn and making it Japan's largest club operator by sales, and investors paid up for the scale. FY03/25 results, released on May 9, 2025, after the close, confirmed the ¥64bn top line, and through the summer the market treated the enlarged company as a recovery story.

02 · When scale did not become profit From the September peak the shares slid for eight months as each quarter showed the larger company was not more profitable. 1Q OP was a ¥280m loss (reported August 8, after the close); the 1H barely broke even; 3Q OP fell 46% YoY (reported February 12, after the close). Merging Oasis added depreciation and head-office cost faster than membership gains, and the equity ratio fell from 21.8% to 17.0%. The stock underperformed TOPIX by about 40ppt over the two years.

03 · When the new management cleared the deck On May 8, 2026, after the close, Renaissance announced several things at once. The FY03/26 results carried a ¥3.06bn impairment across 38 clubs and a ¥2.1bn net loss. Chairman Okamoto Toshiharu stepped down as a representative director, leaving president Mochizuki Misao as sole CEO. The company scrapped its 2024–2027 plan for a 2026–2030 plan and cut directors' bonuses. The next trading day the stock fell only 2.0% — the shares had already fallen about 22% from the peak, so the market had absorbed much of the bad news.

04 · Where the stock stands now The shares have recovered to ¥1,040, about 7% off the June low. At that price the EV, including ¥14.8bn of lease liabilities, is roughly ¥41.9bn. That is about 23x the ¥1.8bn of OP the company guides to for FY03/27, but only about 12x the ¥3.5bn the 2030 plan targets. In other words, investors already give the turnaround some credit but want to see it in the numbers. The open question is whether cost reform lifts the margin before FY03/28 lease accounting pushes the equity ratio down toward 10%.

02 · CONTENTION

What investors disagree about

Margins, diversification, and balance-sheet capacity decide whether recovery lasts.

DEBATE 01 · MARGIN
Can cost reform lift the margin faster than costs rise?

Renaissance earned an 8% OP margin before COVID; FY03/26 was 2.4%. Management says the fix is to close unprofitable clubs, cut head-office cost from 6.1% to 5.2% of sales with software and AI, and raise prices. What matters is whether those actions outrun the rent, utility and wage inflation squeezing a property-heavy club model.

BULL
  • The first price increase in years, in October 2025, which lifted average membership revenue 2.2% while churn held at 3.2% — members accepted it.
BEAR
  • Management itself calls the problem structural — costs have been rising faster than sales — and the previous three-year plan, written in 2024, was abandoned as unreachable.
  • Rent runs on 10-to-30-year leases that cannot be cut quickly, electricity and wages keep climbing, and cheap 24-hour gyms cap how far prices can go.
DEBATE 02 · THE PIVOT
Does moving beyond clubs create value, or dilute a weak core?

The plan calls the strategy "beyond dependence on sports clubs." It would grow the capital-light lines — municipal and corporate health-promotion from ¥3.4bn to ¥8.2bn, nursing-rehab from ¥2.5bn to ¥4.2bn, home fitness from ¥3.9bn to ¥5.5bn by FY03/30 — while holding club revenue roughly flat. What matters is whether these lines earn their keep or just spread management thin.

BULL
  • The newer lines use assets the clubs already have: exercise programs, trainers and rehabilitation know-how, sold without building more clubs.
  • Nursing-rehab revenue grew 22.1% YoY in FY03/26 after the Kaede-no-Kaze acquisition, and the municipal and corporate line — public-pool management, school-swimming contracts, workplace health programs — needs little capital and grew 4.2%.
BEAR
  • Home fitness fell 18.6% in FY03/26 as a hit stepper faded — a reminder these lines are volatile, not steady.
  • Nursing-rehab still loses money and depends on regulated reimbursement. None is large enough yet to move a ¥65bn company, and none has a listed track record to rely on.
DEBATE 03 · BALANCE SHEET
Does a thin balance sheet force a capital raise?

The equity ratio is 17.0%, and the plan says new lease-accounting rules from FY03/28 will bring more leases on balance sheet and push it toward 10%. Net debt including leases, ¥22.2bn, exceeds the ¥19.7bn equity value. What matters is whether the company can repair the balance sheet from cash flow, or has to raise equity.

BULL
  • The plan puts ¥10bn of its expected ¥26bn five-year operating cash flow toward debt repayment, ahead of growth investment and dividends. Holding the ¥13 dividend through the loss year shows that shareholder returns remain part of the plan.
BEAR
  • OP covered interest only 1.9 times in FY03/26, and FCF was slightly negative after ¥4.1bn of capital spending.
03 · INFLECTIONS

What has already changed

Who is on the register, and is anyone selling?
STANDING · DIC HOLDS 17.8%
  • DIC created Renaissance as an in-house venture in 1979 and has held its share count unchanged for a decade. The stake is a stable anchor rather than an active overhang, although DIC has never stated what it ultimately intends to do with it.
NOVEMBER 2022 · ADVANTAGE PARTNERS ENTERED
  • Advantage Partners invested ¥3.5bn through unlisted preferred shares in a capital and business alliance. The preferred structure ranks ahead of common equity and puts an engaged value-up investor behind the current operating reset.
Are members staying, and paying more?
APRIL 2025 · OASIS MERGER
  • The Tokyu Sports Oasis merger added clubs and corporate and health-insurance members sold through Oasis channels. Total membership ended FY03/26 at 442,085, up 1.7%, widening the recurring base that funds the recovery.
OCTOBER 2025 · FIRST PRICE RISE IN YEARS
  • Average membership revenue rose 2.2% to ¥10,193 after the increase, while withdrawals held at 3.2%. Members accepted part of the higher price, giving Renaissance its first evidence that inflation can be passed through without damaging retention.
Is the club model being eroded?
STANDING · LOW-COST GYMS
  • Unmanned and micro-format gyms undercut full clubs for customers who want only basic equipment. Renaissance has added 24-hour access, baths, and coworking space to defend a higher-priced offer, but the low end remains contested.
MAY 2026 · CLUB IMPAIRMENT
  • Rising rent, utilities, and wages led Renaissance to write down 38 clubs and plan exits from six high-rent city-center sites, producing a ¥3.06bn impairment. The decision admits that the old policy of keeping every club no longer worked.
04 · CATALYST

Disclosure & Capital Levers

The plan needs to appear in earnings and cash flow.

LEVER 01 · EXECUTION
Show the margin turning in the quarterly numbers
OP margin · actual → plan (%)
FY03/20 (pre-COVID)
7.3%
FY03/26 actual
2.4%
FY03/27 guidance
2.65%
FY03/30 plan
4.5%
the plan asks the margin to nearly double from the FY03/26 low, back toward — not to — the pre-COVID level
  • The impairment and the new plan are announced; what is unproven is that the reformed cost base earns more.
  • The first read is 1Q results, due in early August 2026 — though the June-to-August quarter is seasonally the weakest, so the 1H in November is the fairer test.
What it takes
Execution, not cash
When it could happen
1Q FY03/27 results · early Aug 2026
LEVER 02 · MIX
Turn the non-club lines into disclosed, growing profit
Revenue by line · FY03/26 → FY03/30 plan (¥bn)
Sports clubs
55.1 → 58.0
Municipal & corporate health
3.4 → 8.2
Home fitness
3.9 → 5.5
Nursing-rehab
2.5 → 4.2
clubs held roughly flat; the ¥77bn target rests on the three lighter-capital lines growing ~1.5x
  • The plan's shape — flat clubs, growing everything else — only becomes checkable if Renaissance reports the lines separately and shows their profit, not just their sales.
  • Nursing-rehab already grew 22.1% after an acquisition; the municipal and corporate line is capital-light and grew 4.2%; home fitness is the volatile one.
What it takes
Segment disclosure + capex
When it could happen
FY03/26 annual detail · already filed
LEVER 03 · CAPITAL RETURNS
Turn deleveraging into a credible return framework
Five-year operating cash flow · planned use (¥bn)
Business investment
¥14bn
Debt paydown
¥10bn
Shareholder returns
¥2bn
FY03/26 dividend (held)
¥13.00
the priority is the balance sheet — returns are the smallest slice, and there is no buyback
  • Holding the ¥13 dividend through the loss year was a good sign, but there is no buyback and returns stay small — which fits while the balance sheet is thin, yet leaves little for shareholders to point to.
  • A higher dividend or a buyback becomes realistic once the equity ratio stabilizes.
What it takes
Board resolution + cash
When it could happen
1H FY03/27 results · Nov 2026
05 · VALUATION

Scenario Pathways

The cases start from ¥1,040 and depressed FY03/27 earnings.

BEAR SCENARIO
¥800 – ¥950
−23% to −9%
implied ~8x EV/EBITDA incl. leases on softer OP
The reform stalls: cost inflation offsets the closures, a fresh impairment appears, or FY03/28 lease accounting cuts equity toward 10%, and the turnaround premium comes out. Investors mark the business down to the club-operator floor set by net-cash Central Sports.

Even here the ¥13 dividend is stated policy, and the 442,000-member base keeps generating cash.

BASE SCENARIO
¥1,000 – ¥1,150
−4% to +11%
implied ~8.5x EV/EBITDA incl. leases
Phase-one repair runs to plan: FY03/27 OP reaches the ¥1.8bn guided, head-office cost falls, and net debt starts down. The multiple holds roughly where it is — execution on track, but no re-rating until the margin story is visible.
BULL SCENARIO
¥1,200 – ¥1,290
+15% to +24%
implied ~8.8x EV/EBITDA incl. leases on recovered OP
The margin reform shows through: OP moves onto the path toward the ¥3.5bn FY03/30 target, the non-club lines add disclosed profit, and the market looks past today's depressed earnings to mid-cycle. The multiple falls as profit rises.

The top of the range is the ¥1,290 September-2025 peak — reclaiming it needs the margin, not just the plan.

SUM-OF-PARTS · OPERATING BUSINESS
One integrated club operator — sports facilities, plus the home-fitness, nursing and municipal-health lines
FY03/26 OP¥1,566M
FY03/26 EBITDA (OP + dep)¥4,956M
FY03/26 revenue · growth¥64,934M · +1.9%
Group OP margin2.4% (FY03/25 3.1%)
Assumed EV / EBITDA · incl. leases7.5–9.5x
Implied operating EV is ¥37.5–47.5bn at 7.5–9.5x normalized EBITDA. EBITDA, rather than depressed EBIT, fits the property-heavy model and brackets Central Sports and Curves.
SUM-OF-PARTS · NET DEBT
A property-heavy balance sheet: borrowings plus large lease liabilities
Cash & deposits¥8.6bn
Borrowings + convertible bond¥16.0bn
Lease liabilities¥14.8bn
= Net debt (incl. leases)¥22.2bn
Net debt / market cap113%
Excluding leases, net debt is ¥7.4bn and landlord deposits are ¥11.9bn. FY03/28 lease accounting brings more leases on balance sheet, driving the guided 10% equity ratio.
PEER MULTIPLE LADDER · forward EV / OP
Listed Japanese fitness / leisure operators (live July 9 prices; each name's own forward OP guidance)
Central Sports (4801)~6.7x
Curves Holdings (7085)~10.2x
Renaissance (2378) · ex-lease~15.0x*
Renaissance (2378) · incl. leases~23.3x*
Konami Group (9766)~15.5x †
Snapshot July 9, 2026; Renaissance uses FY03/27 OP guidance. Konami's fitness unit is small; RIZAP is a diversified IFRS conglomerate, so both are context only.
PEER MULTIPLE LADDER · what each peer does
Why the comparison is fair, and where it is not
Central Sports (4801)total clubs; owns its land; net cash
Curves (7085)women's circuit-training franchise
Konami (9766)games group with a clubs segment
RIZAP (2928)chocoZAP low-price gyms; diversified conglomerate
Central Sports is the cleanest peer: owned property and net cash support healthier profit. Renaissance's higher multiple reflects depressed earnings and lease debt, not superior quality.
EQUITY BRIDGE · implied value per share
Operating EV minus net debt including leases, divided by common shares ex-treasury
Operating EV (7.5–9.5x EBITDA)¥37.5–47.5bn
− Net debt incl. leases¥22.2bn
= Implied equity value¥15.3–25.3bn
÷ common shares ex-treasury18,915,942
= Implied value per share¥807–1,336
vs ¥1,040 close−22% to +28%
Our midpoint is about ¥1,070. It excludes 2.092m Class-A preferred shares, which would dilute common holders roughly 10% if converted, and the ¥13 dividend.
Important Disclaimer · 重要なご注意

This is not investment advice.

Japan Investor Interface Co., Ltd. ("JII") is an investor-relations (IR) consultancy. JII is not a registered investment advisor, financial advisor, broker-dealer, or securities firm in any jurisdiction. JII is not registered as a Financial Instruments Business Operator (金融商品取引業者) under Japan's Financial Instruments and Exchange Act. JII does not have a 投資助言・代理業 registration and does not provide investment advice or solicit the purchase, sale, or holding of any security.

JII Compounders is an editorial publication. Each profile is an analytical study of how publicly disclosed information about a Japanese listed company has been received by the market. It is intended for educational and research purposes for IR professionals, finance students, journalists, and other readers interested in corporate disclosure practice. Nothing in this publication constitutes a recommendation, opinion, suggestion, or solicitation to buy, sell, or hold any security, derivative, or other financial instrument. Price targets, scenario ranges, multiples, and comparable-company references are illustrative of analytical method only and must not be interpreted as JII's investment opinion. JII does not have an investment opinion on any security discussed.

No reliance. The information presented may be incomplete, out of date, or incorrect. Forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain. Past price performance does not indicate future results. Estimates and scenario figures are not predictions and may not be achieved. JII makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or reliability of any information in this publication.

No fiduciary or advisory relationship. Reading this publication does not create any advisory, fiduciary, or professional relationship between you and JII. Before making any investment, tax, accounting, legal, or other decision, you should consult qualified, licensed advisors in your jurisdiction and conduct your own independent due diligence based on primary disclosures issued by the company concerned.

Conflicts & positions. JII may provide paid IR translation, interpretation, English-review, or consultation services to Japanese listed companies, including companies discussed in this publication. JII does not trade in or hold positions in the securities of companies profiled. Where a JII engagement exists with a profiled company, that fact will be disclosed at the top of the profile.

Trademarks & data. Company names, logos, tickers, and product names referenced are the property of their respective owners. Share-price data is licensed from third-party providers. TradingView is a trademark of TradingView, Inc. All rights reserved.

本資料は、日本の金融商品取引法に基づく投資助言・代理業ではなく、特定の有価証券の売買その他の取引の勧誘・推奨を目的とするものではありません。本資料は教育・研究を目的とした分析記事であり、JII(株式会社ジャパン・インベスター・インターフェース)は、本資料の内容に基づく投資判断について一切の責任を負いません。投資の判断はご自身の責任と独立した調査に基づいて行ってください。

All Compounder Profiles · Methodology Language: EN · JP Japan Investor Interface Co., Ltd.