J|I Japan Investor Interface · Compounder Profile
TSE PRIME · 2378 · FY end MAR 株式会社ルネサンス
RENAISSANCE INCORPORATED
Japan's total sports-club operator — fitness gyms, swimming and tennis schools, home-fitness gear and nursing-care rehab — rebuilt after an impairment-heavy stretch
Last Close
¥1,040Jul 9, 2026
−19% from the Sep-25 peak · +7% off the Jun-26 low
Market Cap / EV
¥19.7bn / ¥41.9bn EV
net debt ¥22.2bn incl. ¥14.8bn leases · 18.9M sh ex-treasury
EV / EBIT · incl. leases
~23x
on FY3/27 guidance OP ¥1.8bn · ~15x ex-lease · 8.5x EV/EBITDA
ROCE · trailing
3.9%
down from 4.9% in FY3/25 · ROE negative on the net loss
Op Margin · group
2.4% · grp
FY3/25 3.1% · FY3/30 plan 4.5% · 2,020 employees
Shares & Register
18.9M sh · strategic blocks ~40%
founder DIC 17.8% · Advantage 9.9% (preferred) · SOMPO 7.6%
INTRODUCTION

What does Renaissance do?

Renaissance runs sports clubs. It is one of Japan's largest total-club operators — the kind of neighborhood club that puts a gym, a swimming pool and tennis courts under one roof, alongside children's swimming and tennis schools. At the end of FY3/26 it had 442,085 members across 231 clubs, and it was spun out of the ink and chemicals maker DIC in 1979, which is still its largest shareholder at 17.8%.

Members pay a monthly subscription, so revenue is a stream of small recurring payments rather than one-off sales. Sports facilities — fitness memberships and the swimming and tennis schools — are 84.9% of the ¥64.9bn top line. The rest comes from three newer lines the company is trying to grow: home-fitness equipment sold through TV shopping and e-commerce, nursing-care rehabilitation day-service centers, and health-promotion contracts with municipalities and corporate health-insurance plans. Churn is low, about 3.2% a year.

For a decade the company grew by buying scale. It bought the rival total-club chain Tokyu Sports Oasis — consolidated as a wholly-owned subsidiary in March 2024, then absorbed in a legal merger in April 2025. That deal lifted FY3/25 revenue from ¥43.6bn to ¥63.7bn and made Renaissance the industry's largest operator by sales. It also bought the nursing-care operator Kaede-no-Kaze in December 2025 and the outdoor-fitness firm BEACH TOWN in March 2026.

Renaissance did not turn that scale into profit. FY3/26 revenue rose 1.9% to ¥64.9bn, but operating profit fell 19.6% to ¥1.57bn, a 2.4% margin — well below the 8% the company earned before COVID. Then a ¥3.06bn impairment across 38 clubs, taken to clear out unprofitable city-center stores, produced a ¥2.1bn net loss and pushed the equity ratio down to 17%. Return on capital employed was 3.9%, below any reasonable cost of capital.

On May 8, 2026, after the market closed, president Mochizuki Misao — who took over in April 2025 — scrapped the old three-year plan and issued a 2026–2030 medium-term plan. The new plan redirects investment away from clubs and toward the lower-capital home-fitness, nursing and municipal-health lines, targeting a 4.5% operating margin and ¥3.5bn of operating profit by FY3/30. The investment question is whether cost reform can nearly double the margin before new lease-accounting rules cut the equity ratio toward 10% in FY3/28. This profile answers it in five steps: how the share price got here, what investors are debating, what has already changed, what disclosures could move the multiple, and what the business is worth.

01 · PRICE REGIME

What has driven the stock over the past two years?

Renaissance operates total sports clubs — gyms, pools and tennis courts under one roof, plus children's swimming and tennis schools — and members pay a monthly subscription. Around that core it sells home-fitness equipment, runs nursing-care rehabilitation centers, and operates public sports facilities for municipalities under management contracts.

2378 vs TOPIX · 24 months · daily candles + volume
Peak ¥1,290 · 2025-09-25 Trough ¥973 · 2026-06-04 Today ¥1,040
Renaissance · daily candles 60-day SMA TOPIX rebased (1308.T) Volume

01 · When investors paid for the merger The shares climbed from ¥960 in June 2024 to a two-year high of ¥1,290 on September 25, 2025. Renaissance consolidated Tokyu Sports Oasis in March 2024, merged it in April 2025, lifting FY3/25 revenue to ¥63.7bn and making it Japan's largest club operator by sales, and investors paid up for the scale. FY3/25 results, released on May 9, 2025, after the close, confirmed the ¥64bn top line, and through the summer the market treated the enlarged company as a recovery story. The stock trailed a rising TOPIX the whole way, but it was rising.

02 · When scale did not become profit From the September peak the shares slid for eight months as each quarter showed the larger company was not more profitable. First-quarter operating profit was a ¥280m loss (reported August 8, after the close); the first half barely broke even; third-quarter operating profit fell 46% year on year (reported February 12, after the close). Merging Oasis added depreciation and head-office cost faster than membership gains, and the equity ratio fell from 21.8% to 17.0%. The stock underperformed TOPIX by about 40 points over the two years.

03 · When the new management cleared the deck On May 8, 2026, after the close, Renaissance announced several things at once. The FY3/26 results carried a ¥3.06bn impairment across 38 clubs and a ¥2.1bn net loss. Chairman Okamoto Toshiharu stepped down as a representative director, leaving president Mochizuki Misao as sole CEO. The company scrapped its 2024–2027 plan for a 2026–2030 plan and cut directors' bonuses. The next trading day the stock fell only 2.0% — the shares had already fallen about 22% from the peak, so the market had absorbed much of the bad news. It bottomed at ¥973 on June 4, 2026.

04 · Where the stock stands now The shares have recovered to ¥1,040, about 7% off the June low. At that price the enterprise value, including ¥14.8bn of lease liabilities, is roughly ¥41.9bn. That is about 23x the ¥1.8bn of operating profit the company guides to for FY3/27, but only about 12x the ¥3.5bn the 2030 plan targets. In other words, investors already give the turnaround some credit but want to see it in the numbers. The open question is whether cost reform lifts the margin before FY3/28 lease accounting pushes the equity ratio down toward 10%.

02 · CONTENTION

Live Investor Debates

Three debates explain why a company with a 442,000-member recurring base still trades below its 2025 peak after a net loss. Each depends on whether the 2026–2030 plan changes the trajectory, and each will be tested by disclosures due within the next year.

DEBATE 01 · MARGIN
Can cost reform lift the margin faster than costs rise?

Renaissance earned an 8% operating margin before COVID; FY3/26 was 2.4%. Management says the fix is to close unprofitable clubs, cut head-office cost from 6.1% to 5.2% of sales with software and AI, and raise prices. The debate is whether those actions outrun the rent, utility and wage inflation squeezing a property-heavy club model.

BULL Bulls point to the first price increase in years, in October 2025, which lifted average membership revenue 2.2% while churn held at 3.2% — members accepted it. The ¥3.06bn impairment removed the drag from the worst 38 clubs in one charge, and the plan resolves the one-off Oasis integration cost by FY3/28. Guidance is for operating profit to rise 15% to ¥1.8bn in FY3/27. The bull case builds if the FY3/27 margin clears 2.6% with membership revenue still growing.
BEAR Bears note that management itself calls the problem structural — costs have been rising faster than sales — and the previous three-year plan, written in 2024, was abandoned as unreachable. Rent runs on 10-to-30-year leases that cannot be cut quickly, electricity and wages keep climbing, and cheap 24-hour gyms cap how far prices can go. A 2.4% margin leaves little error room before the next impairment. The bear case holds if FY3/27 operating profit comes in below the ¥1.8bn guided, or a fresh impairment appears.
DEBATE 02 · THE PIVOT
Does moving beyond clubs create value, or dilute a weak core?

The plan calls the strategy "beyond dependence on sports clubs." It would grow the capital-light lines — municipal and corporate health-promotion from ¥3.4bn to ¥8.2bn, nursing-rehab from ¥2.5bn to ¥4.2bn, home fitness from ¥3.9bn to ¥5.5bn by FY3/30 — while holding club revenue roughly flat. The debate is whether these lines earn their keep or just spread management thin.

BULL Bulls argue the newer lines use assets the clubs already have: exercise programs, trainers and rehabilitation know-how, sold without building more clubs. Nursing-rehab revenue grew 22.1% in FY3/26 after the Kaede-no-Kaze acquisition, and the municipal and corporate line — public-pool management, school-swimming contracts, workplace health programs — needs little capital and grew 4.2%. These are markets that grow as Japan ages. The bull case strengthens if the non-club lines reach a combined operating profit that offsets flat club earnings.
BEAR Bears note that home fitness fell 18.6% in FY3/26 as a hit stepper faded — a reminder these lines are volatile, not steady. Nursing-rehab still loses money and depends on regulated reimbursement. None is large enough yet to move a ¥65bn company, and none has a listed track record to rely on. Buying growth that earns below the group's own low return can lower the average, not raise it. The bear case holds if the non-club lines stay sub-scale or loss-making through FY3/28.
DEBATE 03 · BALANCE SHEET
Does a thin balance sheet force a capital raise?

The equity ratio is 17.0%, and the plan says new lease-accounting rules from FY3/28 will bring more leases on balance sheet and push it toward 10%. Net debt including leases, ¥22.2bn, exceeds the ¥19.7bn equity value. The debate is whether the company can repair the balance sheet from cash flow, or has to raise equity.

BULL Bulls observe that the plan earmarks ¥10bn of the next five years' ¥26bn operating cash flow to paying down debt, ahead of ¥14bn of investment and ¥2bn of dividends. The strategic register is stable: founder DIC at 17.8%, insurers SOMPO and Sumitomo Life at a combined 12.4%, and the value-up investor Advantage Partners holding preferred stock — owners unlikely to force a dilutive raise. The ¥13 dividend was held through the loss year. The bull case holds if net debt falls each year without new equity.
BEAR Bears observe that operating profit covered interest only 1.9 times in FY3/26, and free cash flow was slightly negative after ¥4.1bn of capital spending. Advantage's ¥2.0bn of Class-A preferred sits ahead of common holders. If reform slips or another impairment appears, a 17% — soon 10% — equity ratio leaves little cushion, and the cheapest fix would be issuing new equity. The bear case builds if net debt keeps rising while the equity ratio falls through FY3/28.
03 · INFLECTIONS

What has already changed

Ownership · stable · founder DIC and insurers hold steady; Advantage the swing holder Relationships · proven · 442k members, 3.2% churn, first price rise accepted Edge / Obsolescence · being tested · cost inflation forced the clear-out; the pivot answers it
Who is on the register, and is anyone selling?

DIC has held 17.8% since the founding, and has not sold. Renaissance began in 1979 as an in-house venture of the ink maker DIC, which held it fully until listing. DIC's share count has not moved in a decade; its percentage only fell as the company issued new shares. This is a stable anchor, not an overhang — but DIC has never stated an intention, so the largest block is a standing question.

Advantage Partners entered in November 2022 through a ¥3.5bn capital and business alliance, taking 2,092,000 unlisted Class-A preferred shares — the "9.9%" stake. A value-up fund on the register usually presses for returns and capital discipline; its preferred structure ranks ahead of common holders. What it means: an engaged owner backs the reset. Next check: whether Advantage's holding and intentions are clarified as the plan runs.

Mitsubishi Estate exited by FY3/23. A joint-venture partner from 1991, it sold its legacy stake down and out of the top ten — float that has already changed hands, leaving the register more concentrated in DIC, the insurers and Advantage.

Are members staying, and paying more?

The Oasis merger widened the membership base in April 2025. Absorbing Tokyu Sports Oasis added clubs and, more useful, corporate and health-insurance monthly members sold through Oasis's channels. Total membership ended FY3/26 at 442,085, up 1.7%. What it means: the recurring base that funds the whole company grew even as profit fell. Next check: whether membership holds through the club closures now underway.

The first price rise in years stuck. In October 2025 Renaissance raised fees; average membership revenue rose 2.2% to ¥10,193, and the withdrawal rate held at 3.2%. For a business that had absorbed cost inflation without pricing, this was the first evidence it can pass some through. Next check: whether a second increase is accepted without members leaving.

Stable, and why it matters: low churn on a 442,000-member base is the reason a loss-making year did not break the equity story — the cash keeps coming while management reworks the cost side.

Is the club model being eroded?

Cheap 24-hour gyms are commoditizing the low end. Unmanned and micro-format gyms — chocoZAP and its imitators — have multiplied, undercutting the total club on price for members who only want a treadmill. Renaissance has converted gym floors to 24-hour access and added baths and coworking to defend the premium, but the low end is contested. This is a live threat, being tested.

Cost inflation forced the clear-out in May 2026. Rent, utilities and wages on a property-heavy footprint rose faster than revenue, so management wrote off 38 clubs and decided to exit six high-rent city-center stores — the ¥3.06bn impairment. Why it matters: it admits the "keep every club" premise had failed. Next check: whether the closures lift the blended margin without shrinking the base.

The response is to invest where capital is lighter. Ahead of FY3/28 lease accounting, the plan tilts new money to home fitness, nursing-rehab and municipal contracts — formats that grow without 10-to-30-year building leases. Next check: whether capital spending actually shifts, not just the slide.

04 · CATALYST

Disclosure & Capital Levers

The market will not pay more for a plan until the plan shows up in the results. Three disclosures, each with a date attached, will do most of the work over the next year.

LEVER 01 · EXECUTION
Show the margin turning in the quarterly numbers
Operating margin · actual → plan (%)
FY3/20 (pre-COVID)
7.3%
FY3/26 actual
2.4%
FY3/27 guidance
2.65%
FY3/30 plan
4.5%
the plan asks the margin to nearly double from the FY3/26 low, back toward — not to — the pre-COVID level
The impairment and the new plan are announced; what is unproven is that the reformed cost base earns more. The first read is first-quarter results, due in early August 2026 — though the June-to-August quarter is seasonally the weakest, so the half-year in November is the fairer test. Each quarter that shows head-office cost falling and unprofitable clubs gone should lift the margin toward the 2.65% guided for the year. The check is a first-half operating margin above the 2.4% just reported, with membership still growing.
Cost to mgmt
Execution, not cash
Earliest trigger
Q1 FY3/27 results · early Aug 2026
LEVER 02 · MIX
Turn the non-club lines into disclosed, growing profit
Revenue by line · FY3/26 → FY3/30 plan (¥bn)
Sports clubs
55.1 → 58.0
Municipal & corporate health
3.4 → 8.2
Home fitness
3.9 → 5.5
Nursing-rehab
2.5 → 4.2
clubs held roughly flat; the ¥77bn target rests on the three lighter-capital lines growing ~1.5x
The plan's shape — flat clubs, growing everything else — only becomes checkable if Renaissance reports the lines separately and shows their profit, not just their sales. Nursing-rehab already grew 22.1% after an acquisition; the municipal and corporate line is capital-light and grew 4.2%; home fitness is the volatile one. The company also took over eight clubs from Tokyu Sports System in July 2026 and five nursing centers in April 2026, so the near-term additions are dated. The signal to watch is a disclosed operating profit for the non-club lines that offsets flat club earnings.
Cost to mgmt
Segment disclosure + capex
Earliest trigger
FY3/26 annual detail · already filed
LEVER 03 · CAPITAL RETURNS
Turn deleveraging into a credible return framework
Five-year operating cash flow · planned use (¥bn)
Business investment
¥14bn
Debt paydown
¥10bn
Shareholder returns
¥2bn
FY3/26 dividend (held)
¥13.00
the priority is the balance sheet — returns are the smallest slice, and there is no buyback
The capital plan is honest about its order: pay down ¥10bn of debt and invest ¥14bn before ¥2bn of dividends over five years, with a 40% payout targeted only by FY3/30. The dividend held at ¥13 through the loss, which signals confidence. There is still no buyback even with the stock below its 2025 peak — appropriate while equity is thin, but it caps the return case. A stated total-return framework, once net debt is falling, would tell investors the recovery is meant per share. The test is any addition to returns once the equity ratio stabilizes.
Cost to mgmt
Board resolution + cash
Earliest trigger
H1 FY3/27 results · Nov 2026
05 · VALUATION

Scenario Pathways

At ¥1,040 (July 9, 2026), an enterprise value of ~¥41.9bn — including ¥14.8bn of lease liabilities — against FY3/27 guidance operating profit of ¥1.8bn implies ~23x EV/EBIT (~15x excluding leases; ~8.5x EV/EBITDA). This is a high multiple of depressed earnings, so the scenarios below turn on the recovery, not the multiple. They are JII estimates, not company guidance.

BEAR SCENARIO
¥800 – ¥950
−23% to −9%
implied ~8x EV/EBITDA incl. leases on softer OP
The reform stalls: cost inflation offsets the closures, a fresh impairment appears, or FY3/28 lease accounting cuts equity toward 10%, and the turnaround premium comes out. Investors mark the business down to the club-operator floor set by net-cash Central Sports.
What would have to happen
  • FY3/27 operating profit comes in below ¥1.8bn.
  • A new impairment or store-exit charge appears.
  • Lease accounting drops equity toward 10%.
  • Net debt keeps rising on the capex.

Even here the ¥13 dividend is stated policy, and the 442,000-member base keeps generating cash.

BASE SCENARIO
¥1,000 – ¥1,150
−4% to +11%
implied ~8.5x EV/EBITDA incl. leases
Phase-one repair runs to plan: FY3/27 operating profit reaches the ¥1.8bn guided, head-office cost falls, and net debt starts down. The multiple holds roughly where it is — execution on track, but no re-rating until the margin story is visible.
What would have to happen
  • Operating profit hits the ¥1.8bn guidance.
  • The first-half margin clears 2.4%.
  • Net debt falls year on year.
  • Membership holds through the closures.
BULL SCENARIO
¥1,200 – ¥1,290
+15% to +24%
implied ~8.8x EV/EBITDA incl. leases on recovered OP
The margin reform shows through: operating profit moves onto the path toward the ¥3.5bn FY3/30 target, the non-club lines add disclosed profit, and the market looks past today's depressed earnings to mid-cycle. The multiple falls as profit rises.
What would have to happen
  • Operating margin rises visibly toward 3.5%+.
  • Non-club lines turn profitable at scale.
  • Net debt falls without new equity.
  • A capital-return signal once equity stabilizes.

The top of the range is the ¥1,290 September-2025 peak — reclaiming it needs the margin, not just the plan.

SUM-OF-PARTS · OPERATING BUSINESS
One integrated club operator — sports facilities, plus the home-fitness, nursing and municipal-health lines
FY3/26 operating profit¥1,566M
FY3/26 EBITDA (OP + dep)¥4,956M
FY3/26 revenue · growth¥64,934M · +1.9%
Group operating margin2.4% (FY3/25 3.1%)
Assumed EV / EBITDA · incl. leases7.5–9.5x
Implied operating EV ~¥37.5–47.5bn at 7.5–9.5x, on ~¥5.0bn normalized EBITDA — the floor set by net-cash Central Sports (~7.9x incl. leases), the top by capital-light Curves (~10x). EBIT is too depressed to be the primary basis, so EBITDA carries the property-heavy model.
SUM-OF-PARTS · NET DEBT
A property-heavy balance sheet: borrowings plus large lease liabilities
Cash & deposits¥8.6bn
Borrowings + convertible bond¥16.0bn
Lease liabilities¥14.8bn
= Net debt (incl. leases)¥22.2bn
Net debt / market cap113%
Excluding leases, net debt is ¥7.4bn. The ¥11.9bn of lease deposits inside other assets is a real offsetting claim on landlords. New lease-accounting rules from FY3/28 bring more leases on balance sheet — the reason management guides the equity ratio toward 10%.
PEER MULTIPLE LADDER · forward EV / EBIT
Listed Japanese fitness / leisure operators (live July 9 prices; each name's own forward OP guidance)
Central Sports (4801)~6.7x
Curves Holdings (7085)~10.2x
Renaissance (2378) · ex-lease~15.0x*
Renaissance (2378) · incl. leases~23.3x*
Konami Group (9766)~15.5x †
Snapshot July 9, 2026. *Renaissance on FY3/27 guidance OP; ex-lease line for peer comparability. †Konami is a games conglomerate — its fitness clubs are a small restructured segment, shown for context only. RIZAP (chocoZAP) is not comparable (loss-making conglomerate).
PEER MULTIPLE LADDER · what each peer does
Why the comparison is fair, and where it is not
Central Sports (4801)total clubs; owns its land; net cash
Curves (7085)women's circuit-training franchise
Konami (9766)games group with a clubs segment
RIZAP (2928)chocoZAP low-price gyms; loss-making
Central Sports is the cleanest read: same total-club model, but it owns its real estate and holds net cash, which is why it earns a lower multiple on healthier profit. Renaissance's higher multiple reflects depressed earnings and lease debt, not a premium.
EQUITY BRIDGE · implied value per share
Operating EV minus net debt including leases, divided by common shares ex-treasury
Operating EV (7.5–9.5x EBITDA)¥37.5–47.5bn
− Net debt incl. leases¥22.2bn
= Implied equity value¥15.3–25.3bn
÷ common shares ex-treasury18,915,942
= Implied value per share¥807–1,336
vs ¥1,040 close−22% to +28%
Mid-case ~¥1,070 — about the current price. The market is paying for the club business as it stands and giving the turnaround little credit either way. Two claims sit outside this bridge: Advantage's 2,092,000 unlisted Class-A preferred shares (a ~10% dilution if converted to common) and the ¥13 dividend. A JII estimate, not a forecast or target.
Important Disclaimer · 重要なご注意

This is not investment advice.

Japan Investor Interface Co., Ltd. ("JII") is an investor-relations (IR) consultancy. JII is not a registered investment advisor, financial advisor, broker-dealer, or securities firm in any jurisdiction. JII is not registered as a Financial Instruments Business Operator (金融商品取引業者) under Japan's Financial Instruments and Exchange Act. JII does not have a 投資助言・代理業 registration and does not provide investment advice or solicit the purchase, sale, or holding of any security.

JII Compounders is an editorial publication. Each profile is an analytical study of how publicly disclosed information about a Japanese listed company has been received by the market. It is intended for educational and research purposes for IR professionals, finance students, journalists, and other readers interested in corporate disclosure practice. Nothing in this publication constitutes a recommendation, opinion, suggestion, or solicitation to buy, sell, or hold any security, derivative, or other financial instrument. Price targets, scenario ranges, multiples, and comparable-company references are illustrative of analytical method only and must not be interpreted as JII's investment opinion. JII does not have an investment opinion on any security discussed.

No reliance. The information presented may be incomplete, out of date, or incorrect. Forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain. Past price performance does not indicate future results. Estimates and scenario figures are not predictions and may not be achieved. JII makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or reliability of any information in this publication.

No fiduciary or advisory relationship. Reading this publication does not create any advisory, fiduciary, or professional relationship between you and JII. Before making any investment, tax, accounting, legal, or other decision, you should consult qualified, licensed advisors in your jurisdiction and conduct your own independent due diligence based on primary disclosures issued by the company concerned.

Conflicts & positions. JII may provide paid IR diagnostic, translation, or interpretation services to Japanese listed companies, including companies discussed in this publication. JII does not trade in or hold positions in the securities of companies profiled. Where a JII engagement exists with a profiled company, that fact will be disclosed at the top of the profile.

Trademarks & data. Company names, logos, tickers, and product names referenced are the property of their respective owners. Share-price data is licensed from third-party providers. TradingView is a trademark of TradingView, Inc. All rights reserved.

本資料は、日本の金融商品取引法に基づく投資助言・代理業ではなく、特定の有価証券の売買その他の取引の勧誘・推奨を目的とするものではありません。本資料は教育・研究を目的とした分析記事であり、JII(株式会社ジャパン・インベスター・インターフェース)は、本資料の内容に基づく投資判断について一切の責任を負いません。投資の判断はご自身の責任と独立した調査に基づいて行ってください。

All Compounder Profiles · Methodology Language: EN · JP Japan Investor Interface Co., Ltd.