TSE PRIME · 4776 · FY end DEC サイボウズ株式会社

Cybozu, Inc.

Groupware & No-Code Business-App SaaS
Last Close
¥2,197May 13, 2026
−47% from Aug-25 peak · +12% off Apr floor
Market Cap / EV
¥102bn / ¥94bn EV
net cash ¥8bn (8% of cap) · ¥3bn buyback announced May 14
EV / EBIT · forward
8.9x
vs Aug-25 peak ~30x · peer median ~12x · strict pass
ROCE · trailing
68%
FY12/23 42% → FY12/25 68% · price-revision step-up
Op Margin · group
27% · grp
FY26 guide 25% · Q1 FY26 actual 29% (ahead of pace)
Shares & Float
46.2M sh · ~73% float
treasury 12.3% · May-14 buyback retires up to 6.5% of OS
INTRODUCTION

What does Cybozu do?

Cybozu provides cloud software that helps companies run internal communication and daily operations. Cybozu Office and Garoon are groupware products used for scheduling, workflow, and internal coordination. kintone is a no-code platform that lets business teams build and run internal apps without writing software, and revenue per customer rises as usage expands and accounts move to higher plans. The investor debate now centers on whether kintone ARPA can keep rising, how clearly management defines capital discipline for US investment, and whether buybacks and broader capital policy become a continuing framework.

01 · PRICE REGIME

What has driven the stock over the past two years?

Cybozu shares rose from around ¥1,600 in May 2024 to ¥4,150 in August 2025, then gave back most of that move over the next eight months. There were three turning points: FY26 guidance in December 2025, the US-subsidiary impairment in February 2026, and the Q1 result plus ¥3.0bn buyback announced after the close on May 14, 2026.

4776 vs TOPIX · 24 months · daily candles + volume
Peak ¥4,150 · 2025-08-19 Trough ¥1,965 · 2026-04-13 Today ¥2,197
Cybozu · daily candles 60-day SMA TOPIX rebased (1308.T) Volume

01 · THE RALLY Cybozu is a Japanese software company that, for most of its 28-year history, was known domestically as the maker of two groupware products — Cybozu Office for small and mid-size businesses and Garoon for larger organizations. Both ran for years as packaged on-premise software and gradually migrated to a subscription model on Cybozu's own cloud platform, cybozu.com. What changed the equity story was the platform's third application, launched in 2011: kintone, a no-code environment in which a non-technical employee inside a customer company can assemble database-backed business applications without writing software. kintone is the structural growth engine. By December 2025 it had been adopted by approximately 39,000 Japanese companies (around 34,000 a year earlier), including a published reference customer base spanning roughly half of the TSE Prime list. Roughly two-thirds of domestic cloud revenue is routed through a network of about 560 partner firms, which carry out implementation and configuration work on the customer's behalf — meaning Cybozu sells software while its partners sell services. The model carries structurally lower service-and-support cost than US-listed SaaS peers (Atlassian, monday.com, Asana) which staff their own implementation teams. Inside the installed base, kintone seats grow without further sales effort — the FY25 net revenue retention rate was 121.9% on existing customers alone, against monthly gross-revenue churn under 1%. From roughly ¥1,600 in May 2024 the stock climbed steadily as that compounding became visible in successive filings, broke through ¥3,000 over the winter on FY24 results that showed revenue up 16.7% and operating profit up 44.2%, and continued through the first half of 2025. The pivotal disclosure came earlier in the period: a price revision and a minimum-user-count contract floor through FY24 and FY25 lifted kintone's average revenue per account from ¥34,100 in FY23 to ¥47,100 in FY25 — a 38% step-up over two years. When H1 FY25 results landed in August 2025 the operating-leverage consequences were unmistakable: the full year would close with revenue up 26.1% and operating profit up 106.4%, a margin print that turned the ARPA story into a P&L event. The stock peaked at ¥4,150 on August 19, 2025, implying roughly thirty times forward EV/EBIT — the market underwriting FY25 as the new run-rate rather than a single year of windfall.

02 · THE REVERSAL The reversal began on December 18, 2025, when Cybozu published its initial guidance for FY26. Revenue was guided at +12.7% and operating profit at +4.1% — a collapse from the +106% just printed. Management framed the slower profit growth as a deliberate cost-base step-up tied to its longer-term FY28 ¥50.9bn revenue target: a special bonus paid through to employees, a planned material increase in advertising and R&D (which Q1 FY26 would print as +28% and +34% YoY respectively), plus the operating cost of newly consolidating Ehime Sports Entertainment, the regional B-League basketball franchise in which Cybozu had taken a 50.15% stake earlier in the year. The deeper question the disclosure raised, however, was structural: had the FY24/FY25 ARPA step from ¥34,100 in FY23 to ¥47,100 in FY25 been a repeatable pricing lever, or a one-time event the company had already absorbed? The 52% ARPA jump had not been decomposed by management between price-revision effect, seat expansion within existing customers, and tier-mix shift toward kintone's enterprise-grade Wide Course. With marketing intensity now planned to rise faster than revenue, the risk that the share of new revenue Cybozu was converting to operating profit (67% in FY25) would not hold up began to be priced. A second disclosure compounded the first. On February 10, 2026 Cybozu booked a ¥1,485M non-consolidated impairment on its equity stake in Kintone Corporation, the US subsidiary it had operated since August 2011 (renamed from CYBOZU CORPORATION in 2016). The sub finished FY25 ¥355M underwater on a net-asset basis; management explicitly retained the US growth thesis and signaled continued funding. For investors the impairment forced the cumulative-capital question (likely above ¥10bn over the eight-year arc) and made the absence of a published payback timeline or exit trigger newly visible. By April 13, 2026 the share had walked down to ¥1,965 — a 53% drawdown from the August peak.

03 · WHERE WE STAND NOW Two disclosures landed after the market close on May 14, 2026. The Q1 FY26 tanshin printed revenue ¥10,246M (+17.0% YoY), operating profit ¥3,014M (+15.3%), and net income ¥2,191M (+21.6%). The 15% operating-profit growth was achieved at the higher cost base the FY26 plan had already embedded: ad spend up 28% in the quarter, R&D up 34%, with Ehime Sports operating cost now consolidated in cost of sales. The Q1 operating margin of 29.4% sat 4.5 percentage points above the FY26 full-year guide of 24.9%, and the progress ratios — 24% of the revenue plan (in line with Cybozu's 23–24% historical Q1 revenue share) and 29% of the operating-profit plan (at or above the FY24/FY25 Q1 operating-profit share of 25–27%) — implied the +4.1% guide was a conservative anchor rather than the structural run-rate. The same disclosure window carried a second item: the board authorized a ¥3.0bn buyback for up to 3.0M shares, equivalent to 6.5% of shares outstanding and the largest market repurchase Cybozu has authorized since its 2000 listing on TSE Mothers, above the ¥2.9bn repurchased in calendar 2024. Combined with the FY26 dividend per share of ¥50 (a 25% year-on-year increase, equivalent to approximately ¥2.3bn on the 46.2M shares outstanding ex-treasury), the announced FY26 capital-return floor sits at roughly ¥5.3bn — about 71% of forecast net income. The operating-business quality has not deteriorated through the drawdown: trailing ROCE on averaged capital employed remains 68%, free-cash-flow yield at the current share price is around 8%, group operating margin is 27%. What the next four quarters resolve is whether the FY25 ARPA step compounds at the new cost base, whether the US subsidiary returns to investment justifiability, and whether the May 14 buyback marks the start of a stated capital-return framework or a single discretionary event.

02 · CONTENTION

What has to be verified next?

Three open questions surface in the company's recent quarterly disclosures and in the IR briefing Q&A. Each one settles a different part of the multiple.

DEBATE 01 · OPERATING LEVERAGE
Is the FY26 +4.1% operating-profit guide a conservative anchor or the new run-rate?
BULL The bullish reading takes the May 14 Q1 print as evidence that the +4.1% guide was set conservatively. Operating profit grew +15.3% YoY on revenue growth of +17.0%, even with advertising up 28% YoY, R&D up 34% YoY, and the new Ehime Sports operating cost newly absorbed into cost of sales. The Q1 operating-profit margin came in at 29.4%, well above the 24.9% the company is guiding to for the full year. The bull observation: an upgrade at the Q2 or Q3 results to ¥11 billion or more in full-year operating profit would confirm the +4.1% number was a conservative anchor rather than the structural rate.
BEAR The bearish reading is that FY25's profit growth came from a one-time price revision rather than a repeatable lever. Across FY24 and FY25 Cybozu raised kintone's average revenue per account from ¥34,100 to ¥47,100 — a 38% step-up that, because no significant cost increase came with it, flowed almost entirely to profit. In Q1 FY26, with that price revision behind it, the share of new revenue that converted to operating profit fell from FY25's 67% to about 27%. Cybozu has not disclosed whether further pricing actions of similar size are possible. The bear observation: if full-year FY26 operating profit lands at the ¥10.5 billion guide or below, that would confirm the pricing lever has been spent.
DEBATE 02 · US SUBSIDIARY
Is the eight-year arc of US losses an investment phase or a sunk-cost trap?
BULL The bullish reading is that the US SaaS market has historically required years of losses to reach scale — Atlassian, monday.com, and Smartsheet all spent long periods unprofitable before turning. Cybozu has the means to be patient: it carries no debt and generated ¥10.7 billion of operating cash flow in FY25. The US business now serves 910 customers, achieved HIPAA compliance in FY25, and has restructured its cost base through development in Vietnam and customer support out of a Manila center opened in March 2025. The bull observation: any first-time disclosure of US revenue growth at 30% or more in FY26 would support the investment thesis — even the act of disclosing the figure would help close the gap between what investors can verify and what they cannot.
BEAR The bearish reading focuses on what has actually accumulated. Kintone Corporation finished FY25 with a net liability position of ¥355 million, and Cybozu booked a ¥1,485 million non-consolidated impairment in February 2026. The cumulative equity Cybozu has committed to the US business is approximately ¥11.5 billion — the YUHO's paid-in-capital figure for the subsidiary. Each year management describes the position as an "investment phase" but does not publish either a target year for breakeven or a level of loss that would trigger a strategic review. The bear observation: a second consecutive non-consolidated impairment at the FY26 results would confirm the sunk-cost reading.
DEBATE 03 · CAPITAL ALLOCATION
Is the May 14 ¥3 billion buyback the start of a framework or a one-off?
BULL The bullish reading takes the May 14 announcement as the start of a regime change in capital allocation. Cybozu authorized up to ¥3.0 billion of share repurchases — about 6.5% of shares outstanding — to be executed between May 15 and July 31, 2026. That is the largest single repurchase authorization since the company listed on TSE Mothers in 2000, just above the ¥2.9 billion Cybozu repurchased in calendar 2024. Combined with the FY26 dividend per share of ¥50 (a 25% increase, totaling about ¥2.3 billion), the announced cash to be returned to shareholders this year reaches roughly ¥5.3 billion, or about 71% of forecast net income. The bull observation: a second authorization or a published capital-return policy at the FY26 results would confirm a framework is forming rather than a single decision.
BEAR The bearish reading focuses on the concentration of capital-allocation decisions around founder-CEO Aono. He holds 17% of the shares personally, chairs the basketball-team subsidiary acquired in mid-2025, and has championed the US business through years of losses. The Ehime arena project, which the company described in April 2026 as "in serious consideration," has been disclosed without a budget, a timeline, or any arrangement to keep the arena business separate from the SaaS business that drives the company's value. The bear observation: if the arena commitment grows to ¥3 billion or more and Cybozu funds it from its own balance sheet — rather than bringing in outside investors such as a REIT, a regional bank, or a naming-rights sponsor to share the cost — that would confirm the company is putting cash into a low-return real-estate project at the expense of the high-return SaaS business.
03 · CATALYST

What could change over the next twelve months?

Three disclosure or capital-policy levers visible in the filings. Each could reweight the multiple without requiring higher earnings.

LEVER 01 · DISCLOSURE
ARPA decomposition · price × seat × tier
kintone ARPA trajectory · FY23 → FY25 (¥/account)
FY23 ARPA
¥34,100
FY24 ARPA
¥40,700
FY25 ARPA
¥47,100
Decomposition
undisclosed
+38% step-up over two years — price vs seat vs tier mix not separately disclosed
The kintone ARPA step is the single most-debated number in the FY26 outlook. Disclosing the decomposition between price revision, seat expansion within existing customers, and Pro/Wide Course tier mix would separate the durable lever (seat compounding inside the installed base, tier upgrades over time) from the spent lever (the FY24/25 price-revision step). The NRR of 121.9% headline currently mixes both effects; a forward indicator the market can underwrite would compress the opacity discount that anchors the bear thesis.
Cost to mgmt
One slide per quarterly
Earliest trigger
Q2 FY26 release · Aug 2026
LEVER 02 · CAPITAL POLICY
Buyback restated as policy — formula or floor
FY26 capital return composition (announced)
DPS ¥50
¥2.31bn
Buyback (May 14)
¥3.0bn
Total return
~¥5.31bn
~71% of forecast FY26 NI — largest buyback authorization since the 2000 listing
The May 14 authorization is framed as "capital structure rebalancing using existing cash holdings" — opportunistic language that the market discounts because it cannot underwrite repeatability. Restating the buyback as a policy — a formula-based hurdle (purchase only when shares trade below a stated forward EV/EBIT), a mechanical dilution-offset sized to the employee-stock grant schedule, or a total-return floor of X% of net income annually — would convert the one-off into a repeatable multiple lever. The framing change costs nothing; the multiple effect is structural.
Cost to mgmt
One board resolution
Earliest trigger
FY26 results · Feb 2027
LEVER 03 · DISCLOSURE
Kintone Corp committed-capital + payback milestone
Kintone Corporation · US subsidiary status
Years of losses
8 years
FY25 impairment
¥1,485M
Net liability position
¥355M
Cumulative committed
~¥10bn est.
no published payback timeline, exit trigger, or cumulative-capital figure
The US subsidiary is the most-debated capital-allocation question on the name. Disclosing the cumulative committed-capital figure and stating a quantitative milestone — for example "breakeven by FY28, otherwise wind down to APAC-only structure" — would convert the question from an open-ended one into a binary, falsifiable one. The act of disclosure itself becomes the catalyst: either it validates the investment thesis with numbers, or it triggers a constructive change of path. The May 14 buyback is partial evidence that the board is willing to revisit capital-allocation trade-offs.
Cost to mgmt
One footnote disclosure
Earliest trigger
FY26 results · Feb 2027
04 · VALUATION

JII scenario framework for the next four quarters

These are JII analytical scenarios, not company guidance and not price predictions. They map valuation states to observable operating assumptions.

BEAR SCENARIO
¥1,500 – ¥1,800
−32% to −18%
implied multiple · ~6–7x EV/EBIT (fwd)
The FY25 ARPA step proves to have been a one-time pricing event; the opacity discount becomes permanent.
What would have to happen
  • FY26 OP lands at or below the ¥10.5bn guide — operating leverage does not re-establish at the higher cost base.
  • A second non-consolidated impairment of Kintone Corporation at FY26 results.
  • An Ehime arena commitment of ≥¥3 billion funded from Cybozu's own balance sheet without bringing in outside investors (REIT, regional bank, naming-rights sponsor) or separating the sports business from the SaaS business.
  • No ARPA decomposition disclosure; no second buyback or formal capital-return framework.
  • Domestic kintone NRR slipping below 115% as price-revision-driven seat expansion runs off.

The bear band of ¥1,500–¥1,800 implies ~5.8–7.0x forward EV/EBIT — below the 7–10x range typical of JP private-buyer transactions. The bear is multiple-driven only if the market continues to discount pricing-power durability beyond what a strategic buyer would.

BASE SCENARIO
¥2,200 – ¥2,800
0% to +27%
implied multiple · ~9–11x EV/EBIT (fwd)
Operating leverage re-establishes at the new run-rate; one disclosure lever lands.
What would have to happen
  • A Q2 or Q3 FY26 guidance upgrade to full-year OP ≥¥11bn.
  • kintone ARPA trajectory disclosed at mid-year or full-year results, separating durable lever from spent.
  • The ¥3bn buyback completes within the May 15–July 31 window; FY26 results acknowledge a second authorization or a sustainable framework.
  • No further Kintone Corp impairment; US revenue growth ≥30% YoY (first disclosure of the line itself is base case).
BULL SCENARIO
¥3,200 – ¥4,000
+46% to +82%
implied multiple · ~13–16x EV/EBIT (fwd)
Two of the three levers land: ARPA durability is proven and the capital-return regime is formalised.
What would have to happen
  • ARPA decomposition disclosure shows the durable seat/tier lever compounds at high single-digits independent of further price action.
  • A formal capital-allocation framework — total-return floor of X% of net income annually with formula-based buyback gate.
  • Kintone Corp committed-capital disclosure with a credible breakeven milestone (regardless of direction — the disclosure itself is the catalyst).
  • FY26 OP lands at ≥¥11.5bn (10% above guide), confirming leverage re-establishes at the higher cost base.
  • Ehime arena, if announced, financed by outside investors (REIT, regional bank, naming-rights sponsor) and structured so the sports business sits separately from the SaaS business that drives Cybozu's value.

The bull peak of ¥4,000 stays below the August 2025 high of ¥4,150 — the framework does not embed a return to the peak ~30x forward EV/EBIT multiple, which would require both ARPA re-acceleration and the US/APAC business turning a structural corner, two-stage optionality outside this four-quarter scenario.

SUM-OF-PARTS · KINTONE CORE
kintone — no-code business-app SaaS · 58% of group revenue
FY25 revenue (cloud)¥21,689M
YoY growth+33.9%
NRR · churn · ARPA121.9% · 0.92% · ¥47.1k
Estimated segment OPM~30%+
Peer multiple (3923, 4432)6–10x EV/Sales
Mid-case implied EV: ~¥150bn at 7x FY26 run-rate
SUM-OF-PARTS · LEGACY + ADJACENCIES
Cybozu Office + Garoon + Mailwise + US/APAC option
FY25 combined non-kintone revenue¥15,741M
Office + Garoon (mature SaaS)¥13,045M · 4–6x sales
Mid-case legacy SaaS EV~¥65bn
Kintone Corp + Ehime + adjacencies−¥5bn to ¥0bn
SOTP cross-check vs current EV¥210–215bn vs ¥94bn
Public market currently prices the deceleration deeply — SOTP supports BASE-to-BULL once a lever lands
Important Disclaimer · 重要なご注意

This is not investment advice.

Japan Investor Interface Co., Ltd. ("JII") is an investor-relations (IR) consultancy. JII is not a registered investment advisor, financial advisor, broker-dealer, or securities firm in any jurisdiction. JII is not registered as a Financial Instruments Business Operator (金融商品取引業者) under Japan's Financial Instruments and Exchange Act. JII does not have a 投資助言・代理業 registration and does not provide investment advice or solicit the purchase, sale, or holding of any security.

JII Compounders is an editorial publication. Each profile is an analytical study of how publicly disclosed information about a Japanese listed company has been received by the market. It is intended for educational and research purposes for IR professionals, finance students, journalists, and other readers interested in corporate disclosure practice. Nothing in this publication constitutes a recommendation, opinion, suggestion, or solicitation to buy, sell, or hold any security, derivative, or other financial instrument. Price targets, scenario ranges, multiples, and comparable-company references are illustrative of analytical method only and must not be interpreted as JII's investment opinion. JII does not have an investment opinion on any security discussed.

No reliance. The information presented may be incomplete, out of date, or incorrect. Forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain. Past price performance does not indicate future results. Estimates and scenario figures are not predictions and may not be achieved. JII makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or reliability of any information in this publication.

No fiduciary or advisory relationship. Reading this publication does not create any advisory, fiduciary, or professional relationship between you and JII. Before making any investment, tax, accounting, legal, or other decision, you should consult qualified, licensed advisors in your jurisdiction and conduct your own independent due diligence based on primary disclosures issued by the company concerned.

Conflicts & positions. JII may provide paid IR diagnostic, translation, or interpretation services to Japanese listed companies, including companies discussed in this publication. JII does not trade in or hold positions in the securities of companies profiled. Where a JII engagement exists with a profiled company, that fact will be disclosed at the top of the profile.

Trademarks & data. Company names, logos, tickers, and product names referenced are the property of their respective owners. Share-price data is licensed from third-party providers. TradingView is a trademark of TradingView, Inc. All rights reserved.

本資料は、日本の金融商品取引法に基づく投資助言・代理業ではなく、特定の有価証券の売買その他の取引の勧誘・推奨を目的とするものではありません。本資料は教育・研究を目的とした分析記事であり、JII(株式会社ジャパン・インベスター・インターフェース)は、本資料の内容に基づく投資判断について一切の責任を負いません。投資の判断はご自身の責任と独立した調査に基づいて行ってください。

All Compounder Profiles · Methodology Language: EN · JP Japan Investor Interface Co., Ltd.