J|I Japan Investor Interface · Compounder Profile
TSE PRIME · 6328 · FY end DEC 荏原実業株式会社
EBARA JITSUGYO CO., LTD.
Engineering, equipment and proprietary products that treat water, air and waste for Japan's municipalities and industry
Last Close
¥2,446Jun 30, 2026
−17% from Feb-26 peak · +8% off the June low
Market Cap / EV
¥58.0bn / ¥45.7bn EV
net cash ¥12.4bn (21% of cap) · borrowings ¥1.5bn
EV / OP · forward
7.2x
Core EV/OP ~5.8x ex-securities · FY12/26E OP ¥6.3bn
ROCE · trailing
22%
up from ~18% in FY12/24 on the profit jump · ROE 17%
OP Margin · group
14.9% · grp
FY12/25 14.9% · FY12/26E 14.3% · ~548 employees
Shares & Float
23.7M sh · ~96% float
NAVF group 10.65% · Hikari 7.9% · Master Trust 11.9%
INTRODUCTION

What does EBARA JITSUGYO do?

EBARA JITSUGYO sells engineering, equipment and proprietary products that clean water, air and waste for Japan's cities and factories. The company runs three businesses. Its Engineering business wins water and sewerage plant orders directly from municipalities, then designs and builds the plant. Its Trading business resells pumps, blowers and air-conditioning equipment made by EBARA Corporation. Its Manufacturing business sells products the company develops itself, such as ozone systems, deodorization equipment and storage batteries.

The company is paid mainly by project. Each Engineering and Manufacturing order is won, built and billed, so revenue depends on the orders the company is working through. The Trading business adds steady repeat sales as customers reorder equipment. There is little pure recurring revenue, so the order backlog is how the company shows investors its future workload.

The business matters because Japan must renew aging water and sewerage infrastructure and cut carbon for decades, and EBARA JITSUGYO designs the plant that does this work. In FY12/25 the company earned ¥41.21bn of revenue and ¥6.12bn of operating profit (OP), a 14.9% group OP margin. It carries net cash and needs little capital to operate, so ROCE was about 22%, a measure of how well the operating business turns the capital it uses into profit.

The stock does not reflect that quality. At ¥2,446 on June 30, 2026, the operating business was valued at about 7.2x forward EV/OP — and only about 5.8x on a Core EV/OP (cEV/OP) basis, which also strips out the ¥9.35bn of investment securities the company holds. Net cash equaled roughly 21% of the market value. The question is why investors apply a single-digit multiple to a net-cash company with a 22% ROCE, a record backlog, and an activist investor on its share register. This profile answers that in four steps: how the share price reached this level, what investors are debating, what management could do to narrow the discount, and what the business and the cash are worth.

01 · PRICE REGIME

What has driven the stock over the past two years?

EBARA JITSUGYO designs and builds water and sewerage plant for Japan's municipalities, resells EBARA Corporation pumps and air equipment, and makes its own environmental products. It wins most work by direct order from the public sector, so its order backlog measures the workload it has already secured.

6328 vs TOPIX · 24 months · daily candles + volume
Peak ¥2,960 · 2026-02-27 Trough ¥2,259 · 2026-06-03 Today ¥2,446
EBARA JITSUGYO · daily candles 60-day SMA TOPIX rebased (1308.T) Volume

01 · When investors paid up for the record year The shares reached ¥2,960 on February 27, 2026, valuing the operating business at about 9–10x EV/OP. The move followed a run of good news. On February 9, 2026 the company reported record FY12/25 results, with OP up 44.0% YoY, authorized a ¥1.0bn buyback, and raised its payout target. A week later news that an activist had filed shareholder proposals added to the optimism. Investors were paying for a record year and the prospect of more cash being returned.

02 · When the multiple fell back From the peak the shares fell about 17% to a low of ¥2,259 on June 3, 2026. Two things drove the de-rating. First, small-cap and value stocks were sold across Tokyo through the 2Q, and EBARA JITSUGYO trades thinly. Second, the activist's three proposals were rejected at the March 24, 2026 annual meeting, which told the market that minority holders could not force the cash off the balance sheet. The multiple compressed even though earnings did not fall.

03 · When the 1Q print and the buyback landed On May 11, 2026 the company reported its 1Q for FY12/26, with OP up 15.9% YoY and the order backlog up 19.6% YoY to ¥32.77bn — a record. The buyback was running underneath the price: by June 4, 2026 the company had purchased 289,000 of the authorized 600,000 shares for ¥730.9mn, and on July 10, 2026 the company announced the program had completed at 402,900 shares for ¥999.9mn. The operating numbers kept improving while the share price stayed near its low.

04 · Where the stock stands now The stock closed at ¥2,446 on June 30, 2026 — up about 8% off the June low and about 17% below the February peak. The shares traded at roughly 7.2x forward EV/OP. Net cash is worth 21% of the market value, the order backlog is at a record, the ¥1.0bn buyback completed on July 10, 2026 (402,900 shares for ¥999.9mn — effectively the full authorization), and the activist remains on the share register. The next four quarters depend mainly on one question — whether management deploys the cash and discloses a clearer capital framework, or whether the discount holds.

02 · CONTENTION

Live Investor Debates

Three investor debates explain the single-digit multiple. They appear in the company's disclosures, the share-price decline, and the gap between the quality of the business and its valuation.

DEBATE 01 · VALUATION
Is 7x too cheap for a net-cash, 22%-ROCE company, or is it fair?

Standard EV/OP removes only net cash, so 7.2x is one read. Strip the ¥9.35bn of investment securities as well — the Core EV/OP (cEV/OP) — and the operating business is priced at about 5.8x. The debate is whether that is too cheap for a 22% ROCE business, or whether the idle cash and securities deserve a discount.

BULL Bulls argue the multiple has fallen too far. At 7.2x forward EV/OP the company shows a 17% ROE, a 22% ROCE that is rising, a 14.9% group OP margin, net cash worth 21% of the market value, and a record backlog. It sits at the cheap end of the group, below the plant contractors Tsukishima (8.2x) and Metawater (9.5x), and at less than half Kurita (16.8x) and Organo (18.8x) — names with comparable or lower margins. The key evidence would be the multiple re-rating toward the water-treatment band as the cash and cross-holdings are reduced.
BEAR Bears note the multiple may be fair. The balance sheet holds ¥12.4bn of net cash and ¥9.35bn of investment securities that earn little, so the headline returns are flattered by capital that is not working. The activist Nippon Active Value Fund (NAVF), whose group reported a combined 10.65% in its June 23, 2026 filing, put exactly this case to a shareholder vote and lost on March 24, 2026, which showed that minority holders cannot force the cash out. The bear case stands if net cash and investment securities are still rising when FY12/26 results are reported.
DEBATE 02 · GROWTH
Is the record backlog a durable runway, or just lumpy project work?

The company books an order, then converts it to revenue as it builds. Order backlog of ¥32.77bn is the work already won. The debate is whether that backlog reflects a steady pipeline of infrastructure renewal, or whether a few large one-off contracts make the growth look more durable than it is.

BULL Bulls point to a record backlog of ¥32.77bn, up 19.6% YoY at the 1Q, behind a fourth straight record year (FY12/26 guidance: sales ¥44.0bn, OP ¥6.3bn). The demand is structural: Japan must renew aging water and sewerage plant and cut carbon, which feeds biomethanation, PFAS removal and energy-saving building work. The company's long-term vision targets ¥60.0bn of sales and ¥8.0bn of OP by FY12/30. Watch whether Engineering revenue converts the backlog without giving up margin.
BEAR Bears observe that the growth is lumpy. 1Q orders rose 40.5% YoY, but a single ¥2.7bn marine-seed-production order in the Manufacturing business flattered that figure, and Engineering revenue actually fell in the quarter. The company's 378 certified engineers cap how much work it can build at once. Acquisitions, the lever meant to open new business areas, were under-used in the prior plan, at about ¥0.2bn spent against a ¥1.0–2.5bn target. The bear case holds if organic Engineering revenue stays soft once the one-off order is stripped out.
DEBATE 03 · CROSS-HOLDING
Why must EBARA JITSUGYO own EBARA, when EBARA barely owns it?

To cement its role as EBARA Corporation's authorized distributor, the company holds 1,095,788 EBARA (6361) shares — worth about ¥6.86bn at the latest close, or roughly 15% of enterprise value. EBARA holds just 0.24% of the company back, and none as a reciprocal cross-holding. The capital tie runs one way.

BULL Bulls see a hidden, appreciating asset the 7x multiple ignores. The EBARA stake has gone from ¥2.77bn at end-2024 to ¥4.04bn at end-2025 to ¥6.86bn now, and the company is already trimming it (1,125,784 to 1,095,788 shares). Sold down and added to ¥12.4bn of net cash, that is close to a third of the market value in monetizable assets — on top of a stable, capital-light distributorship (Trading is 27% of sales at a 16.7% margin). The bull case builds if the run-off continues and the proceeds are returned.
BEAR Bears say the tie is a one-way dependency. The company must hold EBARA stock and buy its equipment (¥4.23bn in FY12/25, owing about ¥3.0bn) to keep the distributorship, while EBARA carries no matching obligation and 0.24% of the shares. Management can keep the stake for "relationship" reasons indefinitely, and the activist that tried to force the cash out lost the March 2026 vote. The bear case holds if the cross-holding and net cash are still sitting there at FY12/26 results.

A note on the 1Q order jump. The 1Q order surge of 40.5% did not come from the core Engineering business. It came from Manufacturing, where orders rose 281.9% YoY on a single large land-based aquaculture water-treatment facility plus medical hygiene equipment for government buyers. Engineering orders actually fell 4.1% YoY, and its sales held up only on the existing backlog. So the headline order growth is a one-off, not a durable increase in the core run-rate.

03 · CATALYST

Capital-Efficiency Levers

The multiple could rise even without higher earnings if management reduces the reasons for the current discount. All three changes below depend mainly on management decisions.

LEVER 01 · CAPITAL POLICY
Deploy the ¥12.4bn net cash and ¥9.35bn of investment securities
Idle capital vs capital returned (¥bn)
Net cash
¥12.4bn
Investment securities
¥9.35bn
Buyback authorized
¥1.0bn
Buyback done
¥1.0bn (completed)
the completed buyback is small next to the cash and securities still on the balance sheet
Net cash equals 21% of the market value and the investment securities earn little, so a credible plan to reduce both would lift the value attributed to shareholders. Most of the securities are a single EBARA (6361) stake now worth ¥6.86bn — liquid, listed and already being trimmed. The ¥1.0bn buyback (completed in full on July 10, 2026) and the payout target raised to 40% are a start, but small next to ¥12.4bn of net cash plus ¥9.35bn of securities. A stated capital-return framework, a target cash level, and a timetable to run that stake off would turn one-off actions into a policy investors can rely on. The next check is whether FY12/26 results add a clearer capital-return framework.
Cost to mgmt
One board resolution
Earliest trigger
FY12/26 results · Feb 2027
LEVER 02 · GROWTH
Convert the ¥32.8bn backlog toward the ¥60bn FY12/30 vision
Backlog and the path to the long-term vision (¥bn sales)
Order backlog (1Q)
¥32.8bn
FY12/26 guidance
¥44.0bn
FY12/27 plan
¥45.0bn
FY12/30 vision
¥60.0bn
backlog covers near-term sales, but the step to the FY12/30 vision needs new business areas
A record ¥32.8bn backlog already covers near-term sales, so the question is what closes the gap to the FY12/30 vision of ¥60.0bn. Infrastructure renewal and decarbonization fund the organic base, but the company's own plan needs acquisitions and new business areas to reach the target, and that lever was under-used before (about ¥0.2bn spent in the prior plan). Each quarterly order print and any acquisition announcement shows whether the backlog is converting and the new-area push is real. The signal to watch is Engineering revenue growth that holds once the one-off order is excluded.
Cost to mgmt
Growth + R&D spend
Earliest trigger
Each quarterly order print
LEVER 03 · DISCLOSURE
Close the gap between a 7x multiple and a 22% ROCE with clearer disclosure
Where EBARA JITSUGYO sits on forward EV/OP
EBARA JITSUGYO (6328)
7.2x
Tsukishima (6332)
8.2x
Metawater (9551)
9.5x
Kurita (6370)
16.8x
Organo (6368)
18.8x
EBARA JITSUGYO is priced with the plant contractors, far below the premium water-treatment names
EBARA JITSUGYO trades with the plant contractors, at less than half the premium water-treatment names, even though its group margin is comparable or higher and its balance sheet holds net cash. A cost-of-capital management policy, order disclosure by segment, a run-off timetable for cross-holdings, and a stated capital-return framework would let investors value the operating business closer to the water-treatment band. The Tokyo Stock Exchange push for cost-of-capital-conscious management and the activist on the register are both forcing functions. The next check is whether the integrated report or a plan update adds these disclosures.
Cost to mgmt
Disclosure + policy
Earliest trigger
Integrated report · 2026
04 · VALUATION

Scenario Pathways

At ¥2,446 (June 30, 2026), an enterprise value of ~¥45.7bn against FY12/26 OP guidance of ¥6.3bn implies about 7.2x forward EV/OP — or about 5.8x on Core EV/OP (cEV/OP), which also removes the ¥9.35bn of investment securities. The three scenarios below are JII estimates, not company guidance.

BEAR SCENARIO
¥2,050 – ¥2,350
−16% to −4%
implied multiple · ~6–7x EV/OP (fwd)
In the bear case, the market keeps treating EBARA JITSUGYO as over-capitalized: the multiple stays at ~6–7x, the cash and securities stay idle, and the small-cap discount holds.
What would have to happen
  • Cash and securities stay idle; no new capital framework.
  • The activist loses again at the next vote.
  • Backlog normalizes as the one-off order rolls off.
  • Thin liquidity keeps small-cap demand weak.

Even here, net cash limits the downside: it is worth ~21% of the current market value, a cushion that would matter in any strategic valuation.

BASE SCENARIO
¥2,900 – ¥3,400
+19% to +39%
implied multiple · ~8–10x EV/OP (fwd)
The multiple moves toward the plant-contractor top end as buybacks continue and management delivers one clear capital-efficiency step — a cross-holding run-off or a stated capital-return framework.
What would have to happen
  • Buyback continues and the payout target of 40% holds.
  • ROCE holds near 20% as the backlog converts.
  • One capital-efficiency step: cross-holding run-off or framework.
  • EV/OP widens toward the high-single digits.
BULL SCENARIO
¥3,700 – ¥4,300
+51% to +76%
implied multiple · ~11–13x EV/OP (fwd)
The cash and securities are deployed and investors re-rate the operating business toward the water-treatment band, while backlog conversion and acquisitions begin to underwrite the FY12/30 vision.
What would have to happen
  • Cash and securities are deployed into returns or growth.
  • The multiple re-rates toward the water-treatment band.
  • Backlog conversion plus acquisitions support the FY12/30 vision.
  • Net cash falls as buybacks accelerate.

The implied fundamental value could be higher: the sum-of-parts below points to ¥2,940–4,000 if investors give the cash and the cross-holding close to full value.

SUM-OF-PARTS · OPERATING BUSINESS
Engineering, Trading and Manufacturing — the three water and environmental businesses
FY12/26E OP¥6,300M
FY12/26E revenue · growth¥44,000M · +6.8%
Group OP margin~14.3% (FY12/25 14.9%)
Order backlog (1Q)¥32.77bn · +19.6%
Assumed EV / OP8–12x
Implied operating EV ~¥50.4–75.6bn at 8–12x — base case 9–10x is about ¥56.7–63.0bn.
SUM-OF-PARTS · NET CASH + SECURITIES
Net cash plus a securities pile dominated by one EBARA stake
Net cash (1Q FY12/26)¥12,360M
Net cash / market cap21%
Investment securities (fair value)¥9,349M
— of which EBARA (6361)¥6,855M
Deferred tax on gains~−¥2,200M
EBARA stake marked at the June 30 close (1,095,788 sh × ¥6,256), up from ¥2.77bn two years ago. Net of deferred tax, securities are worth ~¥7.0bn — no illiquidity haircut, since the holding is a liquid large-cap.
PEER MULTIPLE LADDER · forward EV / OP
Domestic water and environmental engineers (live June 30 prices; each name's own forward OP guidance)
Maezawa Holdings (575A)~6.3x*
EBARA JITSUGYO (6328)~7.2x · cEV 5.8x
Tsukishima Holdings (6332)~8.2x
Metawater (9551)~9.5x
Kurita Water Industries (6370)~16.8x
Organo (6368)~18.8x
Forward basis; Kurita and Organo net debt, the rest net cash. EV = market cap + net debt − cash (ex-leases). *Maezawa (575A) on trailing OP — holdco just relisted, guidance pending.
PEER MULTIPLE LADDER · what each peer does
Why the comparison is fair, and where it is not
Tsukishima (6332)sludge / water-treatment plant EPC
Metawater (9551)water & sewage plant build + O&M
Kurita (6370)water-treatment chemicals + facilities
Organo (6368)ultrapure water for semiconductors
Tsukishima and Metawater are the true model comps — public-sector plant contractors, like the Engineering arm. Kurita and Organo earn premium multiples on recurring chemicals and the semiconductor cycle, which EBARA JITSUGYO lacks — yet it trades at a third of their multiple.
EQUITY BRIDGE · implied value per share
Operating EV plus net cash plus securities, divided by ex-treasury shares
Operating EV (8–12x FY12/26E OP)¥50.4–75.6bn
+ Net cash (full value)¥12.36bn
+ Securities (fair value, net of tax)¥7.0bn
= Implied equity value¥69.8–95.0bn
÷ ex-treasury shares23,727,118
= Implied value per share¥2,940–4,000
vs ¥2,446 close+20% to +64%
Mid-case ~¥3,450 per share. A JII estimate, not a forecast or target; buybacks would raise the per-share value if they cut the share count below this assumption.
Important Disclaimer · 重要なご注意

This is not investment advice.

Japan Investor Interface Co., Ltd. ("JII") is an investor-relations (IR) consultancy. JII is not a registered investment advisor, financial advisor, broker-dealer, or securities firm in any jurisdiction. JII is not registered as a Financial Instruments Business Operator (金融商品取引業者) under Japan's Financial Instruments and Exchange Act. JII does not have a 投資助言・代理業 registration and does not provide investment advice or solicit the purchase, sale, or holding of any security.

JII Compounders is an editorial publication. Each profile is an analytical study of how publicly disclosed information about a Japanese listed company has been received by the market. It is intended for educational and research purposes for IR professionals, finance students, journalists, and other readers interested in corporate disclosure practice. Nothing in this publication constitutes a recommendation, opinion, suggestion, or solicitation to buy, sell, or hold any security, derivative, or other financial instrument. Price targets, scenario ranges, multiples, and comparable-company references are illustrative of analytical method only and must not be interpreted as JII's investment opinion. JII does not have an investment opinion on any security discussed.

No reliance. The information presented may be incomplete, out of date, or incorrect. Forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain. Past price performance does not indicate future results. Estimates and scenario figures are not predictions and may not be achieved. JII makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or reliability of any information in this publication.

No fiduciary or advisory relationship. Reading this publication does not create any advisory, fiduciary, or professional relationship between you and JII. Before making any investment, tax, accounting, legal, or other decision, you should consult qualified, licensed advisors in your jurisdiction and conduct your own independent due diligence based on primary disclosures issued by the company concerned.

Conflicts & positions. JII may provide paid IR translation, interpretation, English-review, or consultation services to Japanese listed companies, including companies discussed in this publication. JII does not trade in or hold positions in the securities of companies profiled. Where a JII engagement exists with a profiled company, that fact will be disclosed at the top of the profile.

Trademarks & data. Company names, logos, tickers, and product names referenced are the property of their respective owners. Share-price data is licensed from third-party providers. TradingView is a trademark of TradingView, Inc. All rights reserved.

本資料は、日本の金融商品取引法に基づく投資助言・代理業ではなく、特定の有価証券の売買その他の取引の勧誘・推奨を目的とするものではありません。本資料は教育・研究を目的とした分析記事であり、JII(株式会社ジャパン・インベスター・インターフェース)は、本資料の内容に基づく投資判断について一切の責任を負いません。投資の判断はご自身の責任と独立した調査に基づいて行ってください。

All Compounder Profiles · Methodology · Glossary Language: EN · JP Japan Investor Interface Co., Ltd.