Your IR, scored the way an overseas investor reads it.
We diagnose your IR as seen by overseas investors — 12 items, 24 points. English disclosure, investor meetings, and the capital-markets story are reviewed from the vantage point of someone who has sat closest to the meetings themselves, and the findings are condensed onto a single card. Scope: tanshin translations, earnings decks, English IR materials, timely disclosures, integrated reports, meeting scripts and Q&A, and the equity story overall.

We check how it lands with investors — not whether the English is correct

What we score — 12 items, 24 points
Capital allocation narrative
Are cash, capex, dividends, buybacks, and M&A prioritized consistently across the IR materials?
Unit economics / core driver
Are the core business's unit economics disclosed in the investor frame?
KPI consistency
Do KPI definitions and figures reconcile across tanshin, deck, integrated report, and English presentation?
Forward guidance temperature
Do hedge expressions match the confidence investors will read into them?
Management commentary
Does management read as the capital-allocation decision-maker?
Governance narrative
Are board composition, compensation, and succession explained for an overseas reader?
Segment granularity
Is segment disclosure granular enough for an investor to understand the business?
Risk disclosure specificity
Company-specific risks, or boilerplate?
ESG / sustainability context
Is ESG connected to strategy, or free-standing boilerplate?
Investor-frame phrasing
Does word choice match investor culture — conservative hedges, clear commitments?
Meeting / interpretation design
Are anticipated Q&A and scripts organized from the investor's viewpoint?
IR site readability
Do structure, navigation, and searchability match how overseas investors gather information?

Deliverables — the diagnosis card and commentary
- Diagnosis card (PDF): 12-item / 24-point score, top-3 improvement priorities, benchmark observations on one page
- Commentary (PDF, 10–20 pages): score rationale, observed issues, recommended direction per item
- Commented review of English IR materials (as needed) for the top 1–2 priorities
- Anticipated investor Q&A list (as needed) with suggested answer skeletons
- 30–60 minute debrief session; questions free of charge for 2 weeks
Also available as standalone reviews
English IR review
Tanshin translations, English presentations, and integrated-report English scored for transmission in the investor frame — capital allocation narrative, KPI consistency, forward-guidance temperature — returned with comments.
English disclosure review
Timely disclosures, CG report English, and sustainability disclosure checked for specificity beyond boilerplate and cross-document consistency. An integrated report takes 7–10 business days.
Earnings presentation review
Quarterly KPI consistency, key messages, earnings-call scripts, and a 20–40 question anticipated Q&A by investor frame.
How an engagement runs
Pre-briefing (30 min)
Scope, recent overseas-investor meetings, and the state of the English IR materials.
Materials under NDA
Tanshin, decks, IR site, and meeting scripts shared under a confidentiality agreement.
Diagnosis (5–7 business days)
The 12 items reviewed from the investor's viewpoint; card and commentary drafted.
Debrief and follow-up
30–60 minute session on next actions; questions free for 2 weeks.
Frequently asked questions
How is this different from a translation vendor's check?
Which companies is this for?
What materials should we prepare?
How long does it take?
Can you also produce the materials?
Confidentiality?
Discuss a diagnosis
You can start by discussing scope and timing before committing to anything.